Search for: "Wells v. White County" Results 501 - 520 of 1,312
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2022, 7:37 am by Josh Richman
The complaint details how a SMUD analyst who provided data to police excluded homes in a predominantly white neighborhood, as well as how one police architect of Sacramento’s program removed non-Asian names on a SMUD list and sent only Asian-sounding names onward for further investigation. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:10 am by Matt Kaiser
McCarty, Seventh Circuit: The district court erred in dismissing Appellant’s Eighth Amendment claim arising from the requirement that he wear a see-through jump suit when being transported from a county jail to state prison. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm by Jay
Likewise, it is well-establish that that publication may be proven by hearsay. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
State officials: We don't want well-documented corruption in those industries taking root here. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:18 pm
Well, let's examine a case that will serve as a good illustration of these two charges: People v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 5:45 am by Guest Blogger
  Particularly significant is Dale’s well-supported claim that evidence of animus can be found in examining the effects of a discriminatory law. [read post]
29 May 2012, 12:21 pm
The founding New York criminal defense attorneys and former Manhattan prosecutors at Crotty Saland PC represent clients in New York City as well as the surrounding counties and municipalities. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:10 am
McCarty, Seventh Circuit: The district court erred in dismissing Appellant's Eighth Amendment claim arising from the requirement that he wear a see-through jump suit when being transported from a county jail to state prison. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
They included the House Un-American Activities Committee and other McCarthyite organizations (including some within the Executive Branch); as well as the white men on the Alabama jury in New York Times v. [read post]