Search for: "West v. United States" Results 501 - 520 of 4,076
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2012, 11:30 pm by zshapiro
United States an individual must have a “subjective expectation of privacy” in the object being searched and that expectation must be one that is recognized by society. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
The contract clause of the United States Constitution restricts the power of states to disrupt contractual arrangements. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
“We’re not asking for the Wild West. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 9:42 am
., 1235 North Loop West, Suite 510, Houston, Texas 77008. www.dhayeslaw.com, Tel:713-862-2152, or 1-866-332-3567, toll free Earlier this week, the United States Supreme Court began hearing oral arguments which could severely impact the rights of investors. [read post]
Case date: 26 March 2021 Case number: No. 19-35925 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 1:46 pm by WIMS
The Lands Council and Wild West Institute challenged the United States Forest Service's (Forest Service) decision to thin 277 acres of old-growth forest in the Mission Brush Project (Project) area, located in the Idaho Panhandle National Forest (IPNF), claiming that the Project violates the National Forest Management Act (NFMA), the IPNF Plan, and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 10:24 am by John Bellinger
  Under this theory, ATS actions against foreigners for “violations of the law of nations would be actionable…if they matched piracy as an affront to Westphalian sovereignty itself, or if the foreign perpetrator were linked to the United States by residence or some other feature such that American disregard of the offense might cause serious blame to fall on the United States. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 12:40 pm by Florian Mueller
Judge Holderman also compares the number he arrived at with a jury award in Ericsson v. [read post]