Search for: "Williams v. John Does 1-5"
Results 501 - 520
of 548
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2008, 7:31 am
John B. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
BAC level), whereas HGN does not. 16 A very recent investigation17 found that only HGN was effective at distinguishing persons above or below a BAC of .04%, a standard sometimes applied to drivers of commercial vehicles and, in some states, to drivers younger than 21. [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:06 am
Stephens County, No. 07-10729 In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action for allegedly causing or failing to prevent the jailhouse death of plaintiff's son, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) denial of leave to amend the complaint to name five of the "John Doe" defendants was proper since the statute of limitations rendered amendment futile; and 2) there was insufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to conclude that sheriff personally caused the… [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Stephens County, No. 07-10729 In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action for allegedly causing or failing to prevent the jailhouse death of plaintiff's son, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) denial of leave to amend the complaint to name five of the "John Doe" defendants was proper since the statute of limitations rendered amendment futile; and 2) there was insufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to conclude that sheriff personally caused the… [read post]
8 May 2008, 12:01 pm
" Michael and Mamie Williams v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:23 am
See United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 10:17 am
John DonohueIn my view, Justice Scalia blundered badly last week in his concurring opinion in Baze v. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
John Flood, Professor, University of Westminster School of Law, Future Directions in the UK Legal Profession: Life After the Legal Services Act 2007 Larry Ribstein, Professor, University of Illinois School of Law, The Law Firm as Firm Gordon Smith, Professor, J. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 3:00 am
(allegedly a Texas entity), and John Does 1-5. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 6:25 am
[4] The enactment of the Federal Election Campaign Act ("FECA") in 1971 [5] (and subsequent amendments in 1974, 1976, and 1979) [6] along with the Supreme Court's landmark 1976 decision in Buckley v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 8:30 pm
[7] William C. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 2:01 pm
Does 1-7494 F. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:20 am
King Billable Hour v. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 9:09 pm
John Doe Numbers 1 Through 10 Moulin Rouge, S.A. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 10:16 am
" William Lee Pallett v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 1:24 pm
Joseph Buckley--president of John E. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
Sept. 12, 2006) (Order).........................15Tr. of Test. of John Doe No.1, Taylor v.Crawford, No. 05-4173 (W.D. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 9:26 am
Ex. 4 1 5 Hall 1 1 1 3 TOTAL 8 6 17 2 4 0 0 5 1 8 51 No surprises here. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 8:23 am
Rev. 1 *** William H. [read post]
