Search for: "Williams v. Rogers" Results 501 - 520 of 745
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2011, 12:25 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Significant improvement in First Amendment cases over past decade by shift from “alternative avenues” question to Rogers v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:42 am by John Bellinger
On Friday, the DC Circuit held, in a 2-1 panel decision in Doe v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 7:24 am by Kiran Bhat
The first, Williams v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:26 am by Ryan Harvey
United States, holding that Petitioner William Freeman could move for a sentence reduction because of retroactive amendments to the crack guidelines.In United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
Prospect, IL 60056-5788 AMERICAN SERVICE FINANCE CORPORATION DBA MERCHANTS INTERSTATE COLLECTION AGENCY 640 PLAZA DR STE 310 HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO 80129 AMERIQUEST RECOVERY SERVICES LLC 1845 HIGHWAY 93 SOUTH STE 310 KALISPELL, MT 59901 AMSHER COLLECTION SERVICES INC 600 BEACON PKY STE 300 BIRMINGHAM, AL 35209 APEX FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT LLC 1120 LAKE COOK RD BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089 APOLLO CREDIT AGENCY INC DBA WESTERN RECOVERY INC DBA ULTRACHEK INC 3501 S TELLER ST LAKEWOOD, CO… [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
Prospect, IL 60056-5788 AMERICAN SERVICE FINANCE CORPORATION DBA MERCHANTS INTERSTATE COLLECTION AGENCY 640 PLAZA DR STE 310 HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO 80129 AMERIQUEST RECOVERY SERVICES LLC 1845 HIGHWAY 93 SOUTH STE 310 KALISPELL, MT 59901 AMSHER COLLECTION SERVICES INC 600 BEACON PKY STE 300 BIRMINGHAM, AL 35209 APEX FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT LLC 1120 LAKE COOK RD BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089 APOLLO CREDIT AGENCY INC DBA WESTERN RECOVERY INC DBA ULTRACHEK INC 3501 S TELLER ST LAKEWOOD, CO… [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 10:24 am by John Bellinger
  Perhaps for this reason, Judge Williams concurring opinion elicits a rather blistering separate opinion by Judge Rogers, who accuses Williams of introducing “vague and slippery concepts into ATS analysis. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 8:48 am by Jonathan H. Adler
For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the judgment of the district court and further conclude that the district court did not err in declining to exercise pendent jurisdiction over the alleged negligence claim under Israeli law.Of particular interest, both of the other judges on the panel — Judge Rogers and Senior Judge Williams — wrote separate concurring opinions addressing the scope of the ATS and the Supreme Court’s decision in Sosa v. [read post]