Search for: "Williams v. The Board of Review"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,493
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2023, 10:47 am
ShareDuring Tuesday’s argument in Santos-Zacaria v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 7:30 am
William M. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 6:00 am
” The Benefits Review Board (“BRB”) affirmed this decision and Employer took the case up to the Sixth Circuit. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 10:00 am
William J. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 9:06 pm
Detroit Board of Education. [read post]
29 May 2009, 4:12 am
"To demonstrate entitlement to dismissal of a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1), the documentary evidence submitted must conclusively establish a defense to the asserted claims, as a matter of law (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88; Williams v Williams, 36 AD3d 693, 695; New York Community Bank v Snug Harbor Sq. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
In one precedent, the Supreme Court ruled in Marsh v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 2:19 pm
From Justice William Crain's opinion today (joined by Justices Scott Crichton, James Genovese, Jay McCallum, and Jefferson Hughes III) in State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 10:06 am
Bellovin, Adam Shostack and Tarah Wheeler discussed ten questions they hope the Cyber Safety Review board answers and three they think it should ignore. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
Subsequent Environmental Review Friends of College of San Mateo Gardens v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
Subsequent Environmental Review Friends of College of San Mateo Gardens v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts… [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 6:31 am
International Association of Firefighters, Local 42 v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 12:06 pm
Gomez succeeds Past President Christopher V. [read post]
14 May 2013, 9:28 am
By William W. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG) United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG) United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG) United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
19 May 2011, 2:59 pm
Airgas, Inc.); staggered boards (Yucaipa American Alliance Fund II, L.P. v. [read post]
