Search for: "Word v. Lord" Results 501 - 520 of 2,056
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2015, 4:43 am by Dave
That was on the basis of the House of Lords decision in Din v Wandsworth LBC and the Court of Appeal decision in Dyson v Kerrier DC. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:28 pm by Rosalind English
Strasbourg has not been prepared since deciding that case to accept that exceptional circumstances were present that could justify an exception to the principle laid down in that case; in other words, the writing was on the wall for the system of police questioning practised in Scotland. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:00 am by Adebayo Lanlokun, Olswang LLP
Lord Hodge did not feel the clear and positive words needed to ensure retrospective effect were present in s 591D(7). [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:48 am by CMS
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal by a 3:2 majority, with Lord Hamblen and Lord Leggatt giving the leading judgment (with whom Lord Kerr agreed) and Lord Burrows and Lord Sales each giving dissenting judgments. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The proposed panel for hand down is Lord Reed, Lord Kerr and Lord Sales. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:54 am by Marilyn Stowe
Gow v Grant Mrs Gow went to live with Mr Grant in 2002, when she was 64 and he was 58. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The proposed panel for hand down is Lord Reed, Lady Black, Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lord Sales. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:54 am
The answer is yes, according to Lord Justice Kitchin for the Court of Appeal in Specsavers & ors v Asda Stores [2014] EWCA Civ1294. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:36 am
., Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited, [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch), 22 May 2009. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 4:29 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
The evil Lord V. is not just a convention of a magnificent writer. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 12:39 pm
For an elaborate account of the law, interested readers may refer to Chitty on Contracts (30th edition, ¶ 26-010 onwards), McGregor on Damages (18th edition, Chapter 13), and the leading decisions in Astley v Weldon, Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre v New Garage (especially Lord Dunedin) and Phillips v AG of Hong Kong, (1993) 61 BLR 41. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 6:32 am by Steve Cornforth
 I have to say that there were some words of comfort from Lady Hale in the recent case of Dunhill v Burgin. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 2:22 am by Jeremy
Once upon a time there was the Newspaper Licensing Agency, a relatively stuffy and generally unloved body that was seen by many users of copyright-protected materials as an infernal nuisance and as a meddlesome, bungling litigant, as in the notorious case of Newspaper Licensing Agency Limited v Marks and Spencer Plc, resolved by a powerful speech of Lord Hoffmann in the House of Lords back in 2001 [this case is worth reading for the facts alone: here is a 21st century… [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 6:58 am by Michael D. Smith
  In the words of Lord Justice Rymer, “it was not for the judge, nor is it for this court to remake the parties….. bargain. [read post]
24 May 2011, 5:28 am by INFORRM
He made specific reference to the parliamentary comments of Lord Stoneham, saying that: “If the words attributed to Lords Oakeshott and Stoneham are correct, then these reports disclose a fundamental misunderstanding on the part of them, and on the part of many other commentators, of the facts of the present case. [read post]