Search for: "Word v. Lord"
Results 501 - 520
of 2,058
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2018, 4:42 pm
“ Courts in Ireland (Mulvaney v Betfair), the England (Kaschke v Gray, England and Wales Cricket Board v Tixdaq) and France (TF1 v Dailymotion) have reached similar conclusions (albeit in Tixdaq only a provisional conclusion). [read post]
3 May 2018, 8:10 am
In this decision, by different routes, the Court of Appeal has held that the House of Lords decision in R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex parte Ferdous Begum [1993] AC 509 remains good law, thus effectively putting to one side the significant developments in what I would call the governmentality of persons without capacity. [read post]
2 May 2018, 11:16 pm
" (Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 10:29 am
" Courts in Ireland (Mulvaney v Betfair), the UK (Kaschke v Gray, England and Wales Cricket Board v Tixdaq) and France (TF1 v Dailymotion) have reached similar conclusions (albeit in Tixdaqonly a provisional conclusion). [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 7:23 am
Rex v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 1:00 am
The hand down panel will be Lord Mance, Lord Kerr and Lady Black. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 11:17 pm
Collins (2001) where the House of Lords held:- “The word ‘Dwelling’ is not a term of art with a specialised legal meaning. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 11:17 pm
Collins (2001) where the House of Lords held:- “The word ‘Dwelling’ is not a term of art with a specialised legal meaning. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:56 am
In R v May, R v Jennings, R v Green the House of Lords directed courts to consider the three questions which arise in making a confiscation order separately, even if the result was a low order. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 7:21 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm
The judgment was given by Lord Reed NPJ. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 4:18 pm
Whatever the reason, Lords Kerr and Reed and Lady Black have outdone themselves by giving the defendants in Lachaux v IPL & ors [2018] 2 WLR 387 permission to appeal to the Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:58 am
Also, there was a House of Lords decision in 1891, Mobil v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 4:13 pm
In other words, even if there is a flagrant breach of the Editors’ Code that IPSO is sworn to uphold, IPSO often won’t look into the matter if the complainant does not meet its criteria. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 11:39 am
” Roberts began with Lord Mansfield in England and the original federal consolidation statute, enacted in 1813. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 2:06 am
The case at hand, Frank Industries v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 8:23 am
The Supreme Court Lady Hale and Lords Kerr, Wilson, Reed and Hughes unanimously held that they had jurisdiction to hear the appeal because the outcome in Sala was plainly incorrect. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:46 am
Parliament could achieve a contrary result by using the clearest possible words. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:46 am
Applying Simms [1999] UKHL 33, he found that general or ambiguous statutory words are incapable of overriding fundamental rights. [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 5:47 am
Even his most ardent fan could not deny he is no wordsmith or great thinker (despite him saying: ‘I know words, I have all the best words’). [read post]
