Search for: "Word v. U. S"
Results 501 - 520
of 2,441
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2021, 10:32 am
In Brown v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 6:06 pm
V Nonimmigrant Visas for Family Reunification The new bill allows for special provisions to keep families together via the V nonimmigrant visa type. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 10:26 am
E.g., Anani v. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 1:11 am
Note that the reasons for the two occurrences of the word "preliminary" in the previous sentence are independent of each other: the term "preliminary reference" describes the presentation of questions of EU law to the bloc's top court by a national court regardless of whether such reference occurs in connection with preliminary injunctions or (which is almost always the case) in a full-blown proceeding just prior to final judgment. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am
If the word “removed” were to be replaced with “punished,” my point would be exactly the same. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:17 am
” The Prager U v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 2:35 pm
The Reply Memorandum asserted: In the words of nearly 150 First Amendment lawyers and constitutional scholars, President Trump's First Amendment defense is "legally frivolous. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 2:00 am
Archibald v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 11:56 pm
Hialeah, 508 U. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 6:30 am
Garrow’s 981-page Liberty and Sexuality: The Right to Privacy and the Making of Roe v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 6:30 am
Roberts’s invocation of stare decisis per Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Court Allows U.S. Prosecution for American's North Korea Speech About Cryptocurrency
28 Jan 2021, 3:09 pm
From U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 10:21 am
§411(a); Fourth Estate Benefit Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 2:34 pm
Here are the Supreme Court's first, last, and only words on the Emoluments Clauses: 20-330 TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF U.S. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 9:00 am
In this case the U. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 9:00 am
Fund v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 6:01 am
In Chicago v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
Part II examines supply chain’s use of letters of intent. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 4:28 pm
The Chief never wastes words. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 4:30 am
The Eikenberry Case A recent decision by Kings County Commercial Division Justice Leon Ruchelsman, Eikenberry v Lamson, 2020 NY Slip Op 33992(U) [Kings County Nov. 30, 2020], is a fine springboard for exploring the application of these legal standards to business divorce litigation where (as is often the case) the injunction movant’s ownership status in the business is hotly contested. [read post]
