Search for: "Worth v. No Named Defendant" Results 501 - 520 of 2,529
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2013, 3:46 pm
  There are two kinds of cases, commenced Birss J:   (1)  Those where a defendant argues that the patent being asserted against it is invalid and/or not infringed but where the defendant concedes even if it is valid and infringed its only worth $X; and Here, the court can resolve the value of $X before deciding on the merits of the infringement case. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 3:13 pm
David Stevenson, Defender (Respondent)1 What becomes interesting is the wealth of social detail involved. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
A long-running saga came to an end at the High Court in London on 7 October 2011, in Adelson v Anderson [2011] EWHC 2497 (QB). [read post]
28 May 2011, 7:30 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The Partners demanded Houston General defend them which Houston General did, subject to a reservation of rights. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
She cannot say what she really intended to publish. , Gray Area The decision in the Gray v UVW case (discussed on this blog a few weeks ago) was in many ways an elegant compromise in that it named the claimant not the defendant, and the judgement was neutral. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 11:56 am by Peter Thompson & Associates
The second policy was in plaintiff’s name and provided $300,000 worth of coverage and an additional $100,000 of medical expense coverage for expenses within three years of the crash. [read post]