”The Initial Response said:Nothing.The Ministers said:Oliver Dowden: “The only point that I have tried to make is that I am just keen on this proportionality point because it is often the case that regulation that starts out with the best of intentions can, in its interpretation if you do not get it right, have a life of its own. [read post]

Indeed, they must be if humanity is to survive and flourish in the face of existential threats.[26] One reason is that the collective power of business to influence some of these large problems is at least equivalent to the power of nations or global assemblages of only governments and nonprofit organizations.[27] Extending my previous descriptive argument in Business Persons prescriptively, business firms are best understood as “real fictions” in society that are legally… [read post]

It has been almost three long years since dusty Holly, Colorado, became the epicenter of a Listeria monocytogenes human tragedy. [read post]

  In finding its application of Kravis proper, the Board found that the Respondent could not have relied on the due process standard overruled by Kravis as well settled when it withdrew recognition of the union, because the Supreme Court's earlier decision in NLRB v. [read post]