Search for: "YORK v. LONG"
Results 501 - 520
of 11,794
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:33 pm
The First Lady responded, and this correspondence led to a decades-long friendship between Pauli and Eleanor. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:12 pm
Therefore, it expired on February 3, 2009, long before the plaintiffs brought the action in New York state court in December 2022. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 12:44 pm
State of New York et al v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 12:44 pm
State of New York et al v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
New York Rifle and Pistol Assoc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
“How long it will take to compile the initial volume no one can predict,” the New York Times observed.[10] It took decades longer than anyone expected. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm
" See Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am
The Health Plan Excess Fee Case Filed Against Johnson and Johnson In Lewandowski v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 4:11 am
That the lawyer’s complaint was 110 pages was another red flag, although it’s not all that unusual in the age of computers for complaints to run needlessly long, just like judicial opinions. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
Putin ("President Vladimir V. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 4:54 am
Hosp., Inc., 148 AD3d 1418 [3d Dept 2017]), plaintiff Radiation Oncology Services of Central New York, P.C. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:56 am
Most recently, in 2022 in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
§ 1332), has long been interpreted to treat a partnership as a citizen of all states in which any partner is a citizen. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
And tomorrow, Thursday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 1:42 pm
Judge Benitez cited the US Supreme Court’s opinion in New York Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
Written by Mark V. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:42 am
"] Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
"* In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose,… [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
"* In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose,… [read post]
