Search for: "Younger v. State"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,679
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2023, 6:35 am
Fitzgerald of the United States District Court for Central District of California in another case involving against Snapchat related to its Speed Filter – Lemmon v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
From Golias v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:50 am
During the course of this week the Supreme Court heard two cases involving the interpretation and application of article 1F(c) of the 1951 Geneva Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (Refugee Convention) in Al-Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department UKSC 2009/0036 and DD (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department UKSC 2011/0003. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 9:03 pm
The Court of Justice has handed down an interesting judgment in a follow-on case in Case C-427/06 Birgit Bartsch v. [read post]
26 Oct 2006, 6:25 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 5:10 pm
" I ran across it this morning as I was preparing to teach United States Department of Agriculture v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 12:04 pm
He stated that most settle these claims before there is even a suit. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 4:05 pm
The economic effects are stronger among ex-ante politically inactive and younger firms. [read post]
26 May 2017, 8:05 am
The article highlights the People v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 9:17 am
“Skadden’s Litigation Department is well known as a haven of ‘machismo’ where one’s worth is measured by how many nights one can go without sleep,” Gordon reportedly states in her complaint. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 7:48 am
The Ohio Supreme Court this morning handed down an interesting constitutional ruling in Ohio v. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
D.B., in which the state is challenging a ruling that “eliminated statutory rape charges for juveniles younger than 13.? [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 1:07 am
State of New York Executive Dept.APPELLATE DIVISIONSECOND DEPARTMENTInsurance LawGBL §349 Claim Stated on Insurer's Alleged Practice Of Forcing Litigation to Prevent Coverage ForfeitureWilner v. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 9:42 pm
The Judge held that the average consumer included people in the Jack Wills target group, namely younger people, but also included older people, including those who purchased clothes as gifts for younger people. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 9:16 pm
As the Supreme Court in Smith v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 9:05 pm
Arguing for the state in Ohio v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 2:17 pm
Woodcock, Jr., denied Defendant Mid-State Machine Product's Motions for Summary Judgment in the case captioned Glenn Duckworth v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 12:00 am
The panel held that the defendants did not satisfy the five Bauman factors required for a writ of mandamus, Bauman v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:17 pm
" Anyway, Judge Reinhardt's discussion reminded me of that younger, rowdier era. [read post]
