Search for: "class Plaintiffs"
Results 501 - 520
of 34,461
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2008, 10:14 pm
Judicial Panel Grants Plaintiffs Motions for Pretrial Coordination of Individual and Class Action Lawsuits Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 7:18 am
Implicit in the competing lead plaintiff candidate's argument is the risk that the BigBand defendants might later demonstrate that Cyprus does not recognize U.S. class action judgments, thus potentially justifying a dismissal of Jones and leaving the remaining class members without a lead plaintiff. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 3:00 am
According to the plaintiff, by operation of the class definition, persons domiciled in another state were not included in the proposed class. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
The plaintiffs sought limited discovery as to the citizenship of the proposed class members. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
The plaintiffs sought limited discovery as to the citizenship of the proposed class members. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 4:45 am
On the day in question, decedent's teacher and the teacher's aide in his class noticed that he was coughing and they decided he should see the nurse. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 10:24 am
The plaintiffs filed a complaint containing two class-action claims and an individual claim. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 5:00 am
While SAC argued that the plaintiffs' proposed class counsel were inadequate due to a failure to provide discovery, the court noted that it earlier disposed of this objection, and, moreover, that it was persuaded that the appointment of the proposed counsel was appropriate.Finally, turning to Rule 23(b), the court concluded that the class met the predominance requirement (there was no dispute as to superiority). [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 4:06 am
The plaintiffs in the Watts class action had moved the court to certify that litigation as a class action, but the trial court denied the motion. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 6:30 pm
Detroit Thermal is in the middle of a class-action lawsuit filed on behalf of 20 plaintiffs who were allegedly burned by manhole covers. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 4:05 am
Plaintiffs filed a motion with the trial court to certify the litigation as a class action, id., at 2. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
Plaintiffs filed 166 new federal securities class actions in 2013, a 9 percent increase over 2012, according to Securities Class Action Filings—2013 Year in Review, an annual report prepared by Cornerstone Research and the Stanford Law School Securities Class Action Clearinghouse. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 2:06 pm
Class Action Pending- Lead Plaintiff Deadline of May 13, 2019 appeared first on Investor Lawyers Blog. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Such a class is not adequately defined or ascertainable.However plaintiffs were given leave to file an amended complaint. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 10:29 am
In what way would including other products provide plaintiff with the wrong incentives to represent the entire class? [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 6:32 pm
Similarly, the plaintiffs have met their burden to show the plaintiffs are subject to unusual, undue or extraordinary burden by having to respond on behalf of each separate opt-in class member. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 11:50 am
The case that started me on the path to founding the Center for Class Action Fairness is now over: plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed their appeal last week after voluntarily dismissing the court case February 22, giving up any shot at the $1 million in attorneys’ fees they had negotiated for themselves. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 8:39 am
Typically, the plaintiffs who file the class action decide whether or not to bring their case in state or federal court. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 12:03 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York granted the plaintiffs’ motion to certify a class in a putative class action concerning the sale of mortgage backed securities (MBS) by an investment bank. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:30 am
This Wilson Sonsini memo addresses the plaintiff’s allegations and the Vice Chancellor’s reasoning: The plaintiffs argued that the right to sue is a “power” of stock and that the defendants’ charter amendments adversely affected that power of the non-voting stock, such that a separate class vote of such stock was required. [read post]
