Search for: "Courts and Judicial System" Results 5181 - 5200 of 26,731
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2019, 6:00 am by Charlie Dunlap
Rather, its main conclusion relevant to this discussion is that the military justice system is as sufficiently judicial in character as other non-Article III tribunals so as to permit Supreme Court “to review the decisions of the court sitting at its apex” (which is the all-civilian Article I tribunal, the Court of Appeal for the Armed Forces or CAAF). [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 10:07 am by Jessica Smith
In this post, I discuss the key changes to the Alamance system. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 4:43 pm by Jon McLaughlin
The Special E-Business Committee consulted with representatives from bar groups, appellate lawyers, circuit court clerks and members of the Illinois Judicial Conference. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
" (Bolstering the defense theory was the fact that no ephedrine was found in the Plaintiff's system at any time after the stroke.).Both before and during trial, the judge refused to take judicial notice of the ban or otherwise permit evidence of it to be heard by the jury. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 6:59 am by Steve Vladeck
Circuit’s major rulings: Espy and Judicial Watch Although the Supreme Court has not considered the scope of executive privilege since the 1970’s, the D.C. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 2:50 pm by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
The trial judge ruled that the lead lawyer’s conduct, “‘taken in its entirety,’ including actions of his agents and subordinates, was ‘an abusive litigation practice that harms the integrity of the justice system and the jury trial process  and was ‘intentional[,] in bad faith[,] and abusive of the legal system and the judicial process specifically. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 11:42 am by Bill Raftery
I would urge the Judicial Council to examine the need for veterans’ courts, however, and establish appropriate guidelines for the superior courts to follow. 2010 AB 674 of 2010, was enacted. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 9:05 am by Amy Howe
” In its own filing, Danco told the justices that the core question in the case was “whether courts can disregard constitutional and statutory limits on judicial review of executive action in order to overrule an agency decision they dislike. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 1:54 pm by melody
This dual-judge system helps maintain the efficiency and effectiveness of the Texas family court system, ensuring that all parties receive fair and timely resolutions to their legal issues. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 1:54 pm by melody
This dual-judge system helps maintain the efficiency and effectiveness of the Texas family court system, ensuring that all parties receive fair and timely resolutions to their legal issues. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 1:54 pm by melody
This dual-judge system helps maintain the efficiency and effectiveness of the Texas family court system, ensuring that all parties receive fair and timely resolutions to their legal issues. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 7:47 am by Judicial Watch Blog
Just one month later 217 cases were dismissed in Houston’s immigration court system, which is among the nation’s busiest. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 1:00 pm by Samuel Bray
Constitution gives the Supreme Court and the lower courts “the Judicial Power. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 10:30 pm by charonqc
Judicial defeats for terror laws 2004: House of Lords rules that the indefinite detention without trial of foreign terror suspects at Belmarsh jail is unlawful. 2007: Law lords rule that the most restrictive aspect of the control order regime — the 18-hour curfew — is a breach of human rights. 2008: Five men cleared by the Appeal Court of offences under Section 57 of the Terrorism Act; judges say that it is not illegal to possess extremist material unless it is used to… [read post]
Wynn state courts ruled that employing the inherent powers doctrine depends on a specific constitutional deficiency produced by meager judicial-system funding and on an absolute-necessity standard. [read post]
In October 2015, the court amended its sentencing order to reflect the correct fine and to include “[h]ouse arrest with electronic surveillance,” adding that “[o]therwise, the sentence is legal and a proper exercise of judicial discretion. [read post]
In October 2015, the court amended its sentencing order to reflect the correct fine and to include “[h]ouse arrest with electronic surveillance,” adding that “[o]therwise, the sentence is legal and a proper exercise of judicial discretion. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 9:12 am by Rick.Hasen@lls.edu
AP offers this report about this federal district court opinion. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 5:43 pm by Charley Moore and Eva Arevuo
Kennedy told reporters at a judicial conference in August, but legal experts do not expect the court to turn away from the controversial cases that are being presented this term — cases that move to the heart of how America is governed, testing the limits of the power of Congress, states’ rights and judicial interference. [read post]