Search for: "D. J."
Results 5181 - 5200
of 23,083
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2019, 5:45 am
(j) In the table, “Honolulu” refers t [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 6:03 am
The dilemma of animal-created works | Guest post: YouTube shifts the burden: requires manual copyright claimants to timestamp the allegedly infringing material; simplifies the rectification process | Rome Court finds videosharing platform directly liable for content uploaded by users | Illumina v TDL (Round 2): Mr Justice Arnold finds NIPT novel, inventive and sufficient | No benefit of hindsight: BA rejects ex tunc assessment of an intervention in opposition (T 0439/17) | EQEs - don't… [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 4:02 am
Littérature / doctrineIII Règles d'interprétation de la CBEIV Application des règles d'interprétation1. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 12:26 pm
In the following guest post, Stephen J. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 4:22 am
Dáire McCormack-GeorgeThis post constitutes the latest in a series of blog posts reflecting on the skilled nature of work. [read post]
10 Aug 2019, 9:23 am
., J. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 2:31 pm
Stephanie Plamondon Bair, Brigham Young University J. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 10:06 am
Trinh, J. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
Joaquin Castro (D-Tex.) tweeted have at least two things in common: they are all constituents in his district, and moreover, they all donated the maximum amount to President Trump’s campaign this year. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am
The Administration for Children=s Services (ACS) filed a petition alleging that Lynette J. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 12:43 am
The dilemma of animal-created works | Guest post: YouTube shifts the burden: requires manual copyright claimants to timestamp the allegedly infringing material; simplifies the rectification process | Rome Court finds videosharing platform directly liable for content uploaded by users | Illumina v TDL (Round 2): Mr Justice Arnold finds NIPT novel, inventive and sufficient | No benefit of hindsight: BA rejects ex tunc assessment of an intervention in opposition (T 0439/17) | EQEs - don't… [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 11:00 pm
Victor J. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 10:31 pm
Code §21201(d) and (f). [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 9:17 pm
This conclusion influenced another ORHRC opinion, that the “interim measures” provision of §1910.119(j)(5) effectively suspends the “comply with RAGAGEP” provisions of §1910.119(d)(3)(ii): In sum, the only reasonable interpretation of (d)(3)(ii) is that (j)(5)’s interim measures option dictates the timing for when non-RAGAGEP equipment must be documented as RAGAGEP-compliant. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 10:03 am
Lantagne, Richard J. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 10:03 am
Lantagne, Richard J. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 9:39 am
Davis, 426 U.S. 229, 253, 254 (1976) (Stevens, J., concurring). [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 7:41 pm
Code §21201(d) and (f). [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 6:44 pm
New York: William Morrow and Co.Miller, D. [read post]
