Search for: "Does 1-29"
Results 5181 - 5200
of 12,803
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2011, 2:32 am
Notably, the exclusion does not extend to family offices serving multiple families. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 12:43 pm
So does the Intel/AMD settlement raise issues under Section 1? [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 5:49 am
Doe precedents or Doe v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 4:24 am
The privilege does apply to causes of action other than defamation, but it does not apply to malpractice or malicious prosecution (Hadar v Pierce, 111 AD3d 439,440 [1 st Dept 2013]). [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 5:46 am
., January 29, 2019, Shwartz, P.). [read post]
31 May 2017, 5:09 pm
In fact, from May 29-June 30, 2017, it’s Bike Month! [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 1:14 am
How does art come to occupy space? [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 3:17 am
A party’s unilateral and subjective perception of bias does not afford a basis for disqualification. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 12:13 am
It does not protect the nonprofit organization itself. [read post]
19 May 2012, 11:01 am
However, it has been noted that the translated set of claims of the above translation comprises claims 25 to 29, which were added during the international phase and must therefore be disregarded for the purpose of A 100(c) EPC 1973. [2.2] According to the established case law the findings of the Enlarged Board of Appeal in G 1/05 and G 1/06, although made with regard to European patent applications, are also valid for European patents granted in respect of a divisional… [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 7:30 am
California Rulemaking Process On October 28 and 29, the board of the Agency held a two-day meeting to discuss action regarding the Proposed Regulations to the CCPA. [read post]
29 May 2012, 5:01 pm
The conversion rate of the esterification process is described to be higher than 99% (page 15, line 29). [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
Some of the plans are insured; others are "self-insured" and have third-party administrators; still others are "church plans" exempt from ERISA regulation (and thus as to which the government does not assert the authority to require TPAs to provide contraception coverage). [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 6:38 am
First, the proposal does not appreciate that there are really two separate MMF types, retail MMFs and institutional MMFs, with different regulatory needs. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 8:46 pm
Stoll, Maintaining Post-Grant Review Estoppel in the America Invents Act: A Call for Legislative Restraint, 2012 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (Stoll.2012.estoppel.pdf) Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 29. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 5:02 am
” (see Mahoney v Mills, 29 AD3d 1043, lv to app den 7 NY3d 708). [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:39 am
” 29 C.F.R. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:39 am
” 29 C.F.R. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 7:35 am
March 29, 2002) While share transfer restrictions exist…courts do not like them. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 9:21 am
Again, no one should (or presumably does) attend law school expecting only short-term contract employment. [read post]
