Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 5181 - 5200
of 7,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2010, 11:51 am
C.A.), Brooke J.A. stated: The question of when and in what circumstances the court may order such a sale was considered broadly by Grant J. in Cook v. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 3:42 am
Susan V. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 6:22 am
“His disagreement with the Policy does not render it impermissibly vague,” the court stated. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:30 am
He brought suit in state court under various theories of recovery, including strict products liability, intentional infliction of emotional distress, alienation of affection, and the offensive use of laches. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 2:05 pm
In State Farm General Ins. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 2:20 am
Co. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
The CourtMinority Language Education for Majority Students: CS Francophone du Yukon v Yukon Territory On 26 June 2014, the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) agreed to hear an appeal of Commission Scolaire Francophone du Yukon v Attorney General of the Yukon Territory, 2014 YKCA 4 [CS Francophone]. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 4:01 pm
The part heard appeal in Vidal-Hall v Google (hearing to resume on 2 March 2015). [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8] Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 10:34 pm
The appellate court reviewed New Jersey law regarding how the state may prove impairment in a DWI case, and it affirmed the convictions in State v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 2:13 am
A Law Division court considered the question of how this might apply to a DWI case at some length in State v. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 5:48 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:34 am
Over 100 years ago, in Lord v Hull, 178 NY 9 [1904], the New York Court of Appeals — the state’s highest court — drew upon English common law to establish what has become a bedrock principle of American partnership law, that courts generally will not entertain lawsuits between partners except in the setting of a dissolution or final accounting. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 5:00 am
https://t.co/9Fjeq0Qwo5 -> I Duran Duran Loses Case, Brought In Britain, Over American Copyrights https://t.co/dCRYz0o46f -> CBS Sues YouTuber for Posting Episodes of 'The Andy Griffith Show' https://t.co/iv2mgYPiTI -> New PIPEDA Finding exposes transparency challenges in state access to personal information https://t.co/4bn7ZGsXNI -> Who Will You Nominate for the 2016 Clawbies? [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 1:49 pm
This principle can be traced to the English decision of Rylands v Fletcher (1868), L. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 1:37 am
In the courts A.A. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:55 am
A similar view was reached by the Divisional Court in R (P) v Secretary of State for Justice [2016] 1 WLR 2009 and by Blake J in R (G) v Chief Constable of Surrey Police [2016] 4 WLR 94. [read post]
16 May 2020, 12:23 am
Developments in Italy are discussed here, developments in English law here. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 5:01 pm
For published China Cases InsightsTM, please see China Cases Insight No. 1: “In Qihu v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 3:09 am
The decision in Porter v. [read post]
