Search for: "English v. English"
Results 5181 - 5200
of 9,848
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2014, 10:47 am
A recent decision by the Superior Court of New Jersey, State v. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 12:57 am
V. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 6:00 am
Unfortunately, just because a provision makes sense in plain English, this does not necessarily mean that it is enforceable in court. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 11:57 am
Last week the IPKat, intrigued by a reference for a ruling for a preliminary ruling of the European Court of Justice in a case he knew nothing about, Case C-4/10 Bureau National Interprofessionnel du Cognac v Oy Gust. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 10:13 am
Missouri v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:07 pm
The Act does not grant the holder the windfall of both monopoly and reimbursement for its maintenance.Description: The Boston Tea Party, protesting the English tax on tea. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 3:15 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 6:48 pm
Industries Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 3:15 am
Franpovi, S.A. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
Rajesh Batra v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:19 am
See Rosalind English and Adam Wagner’s coverage Bryant & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2011] EWHC 1314 (Admin) (23 May 2011): Arguable case that article 8 ECHR (right to privacy) obliges police to inform victims of phone hacking. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:53 am
” Cy pres, as regular readers of the 1643 revised edition of the English Reports know only too well, originates from common-law limitations on the strictness of the mortmain rules requiring forfeiture of property disposed of other than to a legal heir. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:54 am
-Alabama v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:56 pm
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 10:04 am
By Eric Goldman Goforit Entertainment LLC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:53 am
V. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:53 am
V. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 11:42 am
"Mandamus" is one of a number of the ancient writs that were available under English common law to compel or prohibit actions by a governmental entity. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 11:04 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument this morning in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 9:16 am
The reporting (in English) of the ceremony and the English translation of the 100 commitments follows with thanks to the Pressenza International News Agency which posted originally.The most interesting part of the speech--and its most revealing, is the reference to Benito Juarez's dictum: “con el pueblo todo, sin el pueblo nada” ["with the people everything, without the people nothing"]. [read post]
