Search for: "GRANT v. STATE" Results 5181 - 5200 of 61,285
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2012, 10:43 am by Daniel E. Cummins
On April 30, the Court issued an Order granting allocatur in Herd Chiropractic Clinic v. [read post]
Circuit granted the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) petition for rehearing en banc in PHH Corporation v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 5:16 pm
The issue in this case is whether respondent’s motion for an order granting her a trial by jury should be granted. [read post]
28 May 2013, 7:52 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Issue summary is from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: Rosemond v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 8:45 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Issue summary is from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: Abramski v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 1:06 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Issue summary is from ScotusBlog, which links to papers: Henderson v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 10:59 am by Kalvis Golde
United States, the states ask the justices to grant review and reverse the 6th Circuit’s ruling. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 5:45 am by Madelaine Lane
On Wednesday, December 16, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court granted leave to appeal in Foster v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 3:32 pm by Katherine Gasztonyi
On May 14, a judge in the Northern District of California granted in part and dismissed in part four motions to dismiss filed by defendants in the consolidated class action, Opperman v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 3:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Giving the lead judgment Lord Reed stated that the decisions taken to authorise the segregation under the Prison Rules 1999, rule 45(2), was not taken by the Secretary of State but instead by a senior prison officer. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 3:09 am by Matrix Legal  Information Team
The central question in the appeal was whether statements by the Secretary of State of her policy as regarded the granting of concessions outside the immigration rules and of changes to it amounted to statements as to “practice to be followed” within the meaning of the Immigration Act 1971, s 3(2), which would require her to lay such statements before Parliament. [read post]