Search for: "Head v. Head" Results 5181 - 5200 of 19,775
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2015, 7:28 am by John Jascob
Constitution, and that Duka therefore had established a likelihood of success on the merits of her case (Duka v. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 10:00 pm by Karen Tani
 Virginians Oliver Hill and Spottswood Robinson initiated and argued one of the five cases that combined into the landmark Brown v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 6:20 am by Liz Walk
Our copy contains some 75 additional blank pages, most of which have been used as an appendix, adding cases and statutes under the headings from the book. [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 6:22 am by Jocelyn Bosse
Yang analysed the recent judgment in Optis v Apple Trial E (one of six related trials), which focuses on the terms of a FRAND licence and the conduct of the parties in the negotiations.Marcel Pemsel reviewed the new book by Pierre Heuzé, written in French, entitled L'épuisement des droits de propriété intellectuelle sur un matériel biologique en droit suisse [Exhaustion of intellectual property rights in biological material under Swiss law]. [read post]
1 May 2013, 7:29 am by Sheldon Toplitt
  Defendant Brown allegedly posted the photo under a heading "Retarded Handicap Generator" in which the artwork now allegedly read: "I love making custom signs." [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 OATH, however, had  affirmed so much of the hearing officer's determination as directed the Petitioner to pay a civil penalty of $1,000 per day for a period of 39 days from November 9, 2019, to December 17, 2019, December 17, 2019 being "the date the violation was corrected according to a sworn certificate of correction of the Petitioner's owner".Citing Matter of Call-A-Head Portable Toilets, Inc. v New York State Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 10:23 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Supreme Court rules for the first time that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prevents an employer from declining to hire someone to avoid having to accommodate her religious practices.The case is EEOC v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 6:53 am
  The program this year includes:Priority  - the pitfalls of transferring priority rights from a European and US perspectiveGoogle v Oracle - past, present and future of the closely-watched copyright caseDMCA:  20 Years Later - has the DMCA legislation solved business problems or caused them? [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 2:56 pm by Ben Rubin
  The legal effect of the reversionary clause came to a head as a result of the surrounding neighborhood's discontent over airport operations. [read post]
22 May 2013, 10:06 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals affirms and tells us that a Rule 12 motion is not the best time to seek qualified immunity in cases like this.The case is Barnett v. [read post]