Search for: "Individuals 1-10"
Results 5181 - 5200
of 27,557
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2014, 3:47 pm
Therefore, if the government's interest in ordering the HIV test outweighs the individual's interest in not taking the test, the search is reasonable. [read post]
6 May 2014, 5:51 pm
Among them: 1. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 8:39 am
“Once that number grows above 10 percent, the idea spreads like flame. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 11:15 am
When I withdraw it, I owe a 10 percent tax, or $11, meaning I end up with $99. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Answer: The staff will not object if a registrant that loses SRC status as of January 1, 2024, continues to include scaled disclosure under Regulation S-K Item 402(v)(8) in its definitive proxy or information statement filed not later than 120 days after its 2023 fiscal year end from which the registrant’s Form 10-K will forward incorporate the disclosure required by Part III of Form 10-K. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 4:30 am
Action No. 1:07-CV-1268, U.S.D.C., N.D. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 5:23 am
He found that on February 10, 2008, at 5:32:09 p.m., someone visited . . . [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 12:34 pm
Remedy #1 – Reapply For an individual who has been refused, there is no easy remedy. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:03 pm
Tuesday’s argument, on the constitutionality of the individual insurance mandate and its attached penalty, will start at 10 a.m. and will continue for two hours. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 7:03 am
The plan will begin enrolment for employers on January 1, 2017, with contributions beginning on January 1, 2018. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm
Texas (relisted after the 10/14 Conference for the 11/4 Conference) Docket: 10-10838 Issue(s): Whether the trial court deprived petitioner of his (1) Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process, a meaningful opportunity to be heard, a fair opportunity to present a defense, and a fundamentally fair trial; (2) Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment right to counsel; and (3) Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment right to a reliable and individualized capital… [read post]
19 May 2020, 1:52 pm
(relisted after the January 10, January 17, March 6, March 20, March 27, April 3, April 17, April 24, May 1 and May 15 conferences) Mance v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 6:00 am
Property Tax Component of the State Business Tax Climate Index (2019–2022) State 2019 Rank 2020 Rank 2021 Rank 2022 Rank Change from 2021 to 2022 Alabama 19 18 19 19 0 Alaska 22 23 23 24 -1 Arizona 11 11 10 11 -1 Arkansas 26 25 26 27 -1 California 13 15 14 14 0 Colorado 33 33 33 34 -1 Connecticut 50 50 50 50 0 Delaware 4 4 4 4 0 Florida 12 12 12 12 0 Georgia 29 30 25 25 0 Hawaii 21 26 29 30 -1 Idaho 3 3 3 3 0 Illinois 48 48 48 48 0 Indiana… [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 2:13 pm
Currently, Kansas limits carryforwards to 10 years. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 5:22 pm
Palmer, Fort Worth, District 10, Place 1; William Johnson, Lewisville, District 11; Eric D. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 5:52 pm
(whether individuals or firms), the association websites and alternative structured settlement periodic payment providers. [read post]
16 May 2017, 7:47 am
How this ties into the transitional provision is that without this provision, you would have to remove everyone you had an existing business relationship with prior to July 1, 2014, as per their individual, appropriate 2-year or 6-month dates (the actual date would be unique to every contact); however, because of the transitional provision, you’re given three years, and those three years terminate on July 1, 2017. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
Chapter 74C, Article 1 (Private Protective Services Board) “security services related to entry and exit, direction and movement of individuals at entry and exit, security working towers, and perimeter security patrols at State prison facilities. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 3:38 pm
View the article hereSouthern Center for Human RightsCurrent HB-1059 (Sex Offender Law) Litigation | Yahoo Group2006 News Letter (PDF)2007 News Letter (PDF)10/03/2007Friends,We hope this finds you all well. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 8:50 am
Himes added: "There is currently no bright line statutory prohibition against insider trading, forcing the SEC and DOJ to rely on more general anti-fraud statutes and decades of case law, subject to interpretation by individual judges. [read post]
