Search for: "Land v. United States"
Results 5181 - 5200
of 6,603
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2011, 9:00 am
It was Ratified by the President of the United States of America on October 29, 1963. [read post]
10 May 2011, 8:52 am
It is unlikely that our Great Leader, prime minister Camerondirect, will feel the need to park a tiger ( a euphemism/synonym for vomiting which I have used for 30 years) after reading the European Court of Human Rights decision in MOSLEY v UNITED KINGDOM. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:23 am
Recent estimates indicate that companies in the United States spend nearly $300 million annually on diversity training programs. [read post]
9 May 2011, 1:30 pm
In March, in Connick v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 4:52 pm
In Levine v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:46 pm
” Although the Sherman Anti-trust Act had been passed in 1890, the United States Supreme Court decision of U.S. v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 11:47 am
The environmental plaintiffs rely on United States v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 11:21 am
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David G. [read post]
5 May 2011, 12:33 pm
Different lands. [read post]
5 May 2011, 9:00 am
Hungary International Extradition Treaty with the United States December 1, 1994, Date-Signed March 18, 1997, Date-In-Force MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 104TH CONGRESS SENATE LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL THE WHITE HOUSE, May 8, 1995. [read post]
5 May 2011, 7:26 am
Likewise, in Montana v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:15 pm
”[v] Moreover, and “absent acceptable resolution, disputes would fester … [and] likely threaten the very survival of the community. [read post]
2 May 2011, 1:27 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
2 May 2011, 6:58 am
”DiPompeo ran the Law Review successfully, including publishing a comment, "Federal Hate Crime Laws and United States v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:00 am
Instead, he agrees with the logic and methodology approved in Matter of Murphy (United States Dredging Corp.), 74 AD3d 815 (2d Dept 2010) (read here my post on Murphy), requiring a present value computation of the gains taxes to be paid at a projected future date, here, at the end of the assumed 10-year holding period. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 4:38 pm
See United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 2:51 pm
Lawyers have traditionally represented indigent criminal defendants pro bono but much of that duty has been absorbed by The State in the aftermath of Gideon v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 5:22 am
By 5-4 decision, the Supreme yesterday put an end to consumer class actions in AT&T v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 10:35 pm
The denial of Wollmer’s petition for mandamus was affirmed, Wollmer v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 2:13 pm
” For that part of its ruling, the state court majority relied in part upon a comment the Supreme Court had made in its controversial campaign finance decision last year in Citizens United v. [read post]
