Search for: "Laws v. Laws" Results 5181 - 5200 of 269,267
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2018, 1:29 pm
Federal courts sitting in diversity are “extremely cautious” about recognizing innovative theories under state law (Combs v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:00 am by Jamie Maclaren
TWU Law rests much of its case for lawful discrimination on the Supreme Court of Canada’s 2001 decision in Trinity Western University v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 9:40 am
[Other patent law jobs] [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:18 am by Walter Olson
” [Ken, Popehat] “Why Mitt Romney likes firing people” [Suzanne Lucas] Free speech and union dues: Tim Sandefur on the oral argument in Knox v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: In New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 8:18 pm by Simon Gibbs
I’m just glad I didn’t try to do this with the Court of Appeal judgment in Motto v Trafigura [2011] EWCA Civ 1150. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 4:07 pm by Michel-Adrien
The concept refers to investment by non-parties in dispute resolution.From the executive summary: "In Persona Digital Telephony Ltd v Minister for Public Enterprise, the Supreme Court confirmed that the torts and offences of maintenance and champerty remain part of Irish law. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:19 am by INFORRM
The recent decision of the Mr Justice Christopher Clarke in Wallis v Meredith ([2011] EWHC 75 (QB)) resulted in the Claimant’s case being struck out on the basis that there had been no real or substantial tort following Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc ([2005] QB 946). [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
This week's summaries concern: Mens rea / Criminal law forfeiture / Company windup and pensions / Direction to jury: R. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 3:12 pm by Marty Schwimmer
Technology and Marketing Law Blog:  YouTube and its Amici File Their Briefs in the Viacom v YouTube Appeal. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 7:10 am
Solum (University of Illinois College of Law) has posted District of Columbia v. [read post]