Search for: "Lively v. State"
Results 5181 - 5200
of 29,017
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2023, 11:06 am
The dolls were launched in 2019, with a look and style similar to the OMG Girlz in music videos and live performances. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 11:13 am
If you want to have an abortion but are living in a country where it's illegal, you might as well be living in pre-Roe v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 12:16 pm
Norinder v. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 2:40 pm
In He v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 12:53 am
It’s possible that Liebeck v McDonald’s would be decided differently today - with drinking coffee while driving reducing the punitive damages even further under a more recognized state of contributory negligence. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 6:27 am
State v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 8:22 am
She has made an interim appearance just in time for Valentine’s Day to inject some IP enjoyment in those lives who, like her, may not enjoy gifts of a dozen roses or chocolate but rely on the low-calorie alternative of US IP news. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 2:56 am
Peck from Morris Laing won in State v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 9:38 am
A couple of weeks ago, a three-judge panel of the United States Circuit Court (for the non-lawyers: the highest Federal courts except for the Supreme Court) decided the case of SEC v Scoville, which in effect held that the SEC has enforcement powers against alleged securities frauds which are primarily extra-territorial. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 7:28 pm
In State v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 9:38 am
A couple of weeks ago, a three-judge panel of the United States Circuit Court (for the non-lawyers: the highest Federal courts except for the Supreme Court) decided the case of SEC v Scoville, which in effect held that the SEC has enforcement powers against alleged securities frauds which are primarily extra-territorial. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 10:28 am
The North Carolina Wage and Hour Act does not apply to out-of-state employees working for North Carolina companies even if their employment agreements provides that the law of North Carolina applies, per the ruling of the North Carolina Court of Appeals today in Sawyer v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 5:43 am
In the recent published (precedential) Appellate Division decision of Tatham v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 6:51 am
See Reece v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:37 am
A defendant who was convicted for the gun crimes of Carrying a Firearm Without a License and Carrying a Loaded Firearm recently had his convictions overturned because the admission of the Ballistics Certificate, without live expert testimony, violated his Right to Confrontation under the 6th Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 12:05 pm
State, No. 101,508 (Johnson)K.S.A. 21-2512 appealElizabeth Seale CateforisDenial of new trial after DNA testingMarc Thompson v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 3:30 am
Rebecca Zietlow The United States Supreme Court ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 12:38 pm
Steel Co. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:22 am
Vidal v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 1:33 pm
I live the life I want to live. [read post]
