Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 5181 - 5200
of 19,798
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2022, 9:21 am
They don’t. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 2:43 pm
In September the panel ruled in her favour, saying the matter was not relevant to the issues before the panel. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 11:51 am
B. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:00 am
§ 654 (b)(2). [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 1:28 pm
On 10November 2008, the Federal Parliament passed the Family LawAmendment (DeFacto Financial Matters and Other Measures) Act 2008, whichintroduced a new PartVIIIAB to the Family Law Act to deal with de factofinancial matters. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 2:00 pm
This list is called Schedule A/B. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 8:51 am
H/t to Eric Turkewitz of the New York Personal Injury Blog for the heads up on this decision. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 12:49 pm
The former are already doing better than the latter by reason of having succeeded in the mutual job quest, then they're further rewarded by the EITC, while the latter get nothing.The reasons for nonetheless possibly favoring a wage subsidy via the EITC include:(a) claims about positive externalities, if working today increases the likelihood of working in the future & this benefits others, such as one's children or for that matter other taxpayers,(b) parallel claims… [read post]
23 Oct 2021, 2:40 pm
” Convention, art. 13(b), 19 I.L.M. at 1502. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:23 pm
After all, it's a judicial finding of medical acceptance as a matter of law. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 11:22 pm
Code § 201(b)(1)(B). [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
Because the proposed class asserted claims for back pay, the class couldn’t be certified under Rules 23(b)(1) or (b)(2) pursuant to Walmart. [read post]
17 May 2016, 12:20 pm
But that won’t happen any time soon. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 10:08 am
Huge fines generally don’t interest prosecutors as much as restitution, so this won’t really work in other cases. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 7:14 am
” It depends on the subject matter at hand. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 10:08 am
Huge fines generally don’t interest prosecutors as much as restitution, so this won’t really work in other cases. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 8:29 am
You either need to set aside the underlying possession order (Governors of the Peabody Donation Fund v Hay [1987] 19 H.L.R. 145, CA) or set aside the warrant on the basis of fraud, abuse of process or oppression: Leicester CC v Aldwinkle [1991] 24 H.L.R. 40, CA (amongst other authorities);(b) but setting aside is discretionary, and a warrant/writ won’t be set aside if there is no practical purpose (Southwark LBC v Sarfo (2000) 32 HLR 60 – building demolished so no point… [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:43 am
Does it matter that companies enter into a confidentiality agreement with a rating agency? [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 9:36 am
FWIW, I don't think the Florida Supreme Court is particularly likely to accept review of Kingsway Amigo. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 5:51 pm
” The tuna is the same no matter how many, or how few, dolphins were killed to obtain it. [read post]
