Search for: "Mark C. Good" Results 5181 - 5200 of 5,884
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2009, 9:25 am by Don Cruse
In a class certification appeal, the Court speaks to the UCC's good-faith requirement Exxon Mobil Corp. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 4:42 am
It will be particularly important to build good relationships with key stakeholders like the pharmaceutical industry; ... [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 1:43 pm
“Honda and Ford would have to make only minor changes to achieve good ratings for roof strength, as the Accord and Fusion just missed the mark,” said Lund. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Spicy IP) India will be working as ISA by June 2010: IPO (Spicy IP)   Ireland Riverdance: Kelly takes steps to settle – Jen Kelly’s action withdrawn (IPKat)   Italy Italian laws rigidifies discipline of use of MADE IN ITALY (Marques) La Bella della Daunia: PDO changes approved (Marques)   Israel Israel IP fraud squad supports Maccabi Haifa football team (IP Factor)   Peru Descriptive and distinctive marks – walking a fine line between granting or… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(EDTexweblog.com) US Army - More DOA patents (12:01 Tuesday) US Copyright - Decisions Reporting on 6th Circuit decision in Bridgeport Music v UMG Recordings concerning copyright in 'Bow wow wow, yippie yo, yippie yea' and accompanying musical elements (The 1709 Copyright Blog) (Property, intangible) District Court W D Washington dismisses Freedom of Information Act suit for information on counterfeit seizures: Watkins v US Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (Seattle Trademark Lawyer)… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(EDTexweblog.com) US Army - More DOA patents (12:01 Tuesday) US Copyright - Decisions Reporting on 6th Circuit decision in Bridgeport Music v UMG Recordings concerning copyright in 'Bow wow wow, yippie yo, yippie yea' and accompanying musical elements (The 1709 Copyright Blog) (Property, intangible) District Court W D Washington dismisses Freedom of Information Act suit for information on counterfeit seizures: Watkins v US Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (Seattle Trademark Lawyer)… [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 10:51 pm
Now, keeping in mind, to be a non-traditional trademark, the symbol or device must (a) identify the goods, (b) distinguish the goods from those of others, and (c) indicate the source of the goods, there appears to be (at least) some potential for treating candy bar cross-sections as trademarks, provided the cross-sections actually are used as trademarks in commerce. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 1:39 pm
If the work is removed, you can mark the case as "solved" to close it. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 5:02 am
If I register German generic term A as a trade mark where it's not generic, eg Spain, in order secure registration of A.eu, but it is my intention to use the domain name A.eu in respect of the goods or services for which A is registered, have I used the mark?] [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 9:36 am
Is any such use "in relation to" goods and services identical to those for which the trade mark is registered within the meaning of Article 5(l)(a) of the Trade Marks Directive and Article 9(1)(a) of the CTM Regulation? [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 9:26 pm
Specifically, Rule 7.2 states, in relevant part that: (c) A lawyer shall not give anything of value to a person for recommending the lawyer's services, except that a lawyer may: (1) pay the reasonable cost of advertisements or communications permitted by this Rule; (2) pay the usual charges of a not-for-profit or qualified lawyer referral service. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 3:21 am
(Excess Copyright) Bill C-61 and DRM: How the Canadian Constitution ensures a balance of copyrights (IP Osgoode) Counterfeit goods: Statutory and punitive damages: Microsoft Corporation v 1276916 Ontario Ltd et al (Canadian Trademark Blog) Denmark DRM breaker reports himself to anti-piracy group (TorrentFreak) Europe Pirate Party gets second seat in European Parliament (TorrentFreak) (IP Watch) File-sharers protected under proposed EU legislation - Deadlock broken on Telecoms… [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 3:21 am
(Excess Copyright) Bill C-61 and DRM: How the Canadian Constitution ensures a balance of copyrights (IP Osgoode) Counterfeit goods: Statutory and punitive damages: Microsoft Corporation v 1276916 Ontario Ltd et al (Canadian Trademark Blog)   Denmark DRM breaker reports himself to anti-piracy group (TorrentFreak)   Europe Pirate Party gets second seat in European Parliament (TorrentFreak) (IP Watch) File-sharers protected under proposed EU legislation – Deadlock… [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 3:21 am
(Excess Copyright) Bill C-61 and DRM: How the Canadian Constitution ensures a balance of copyrights (IP Osgoode) Counterfeit goods: Statutory and punitive damages: Microsoft Corporation v 1276916 Ontario Ltd et al (Canadian Trademark Blog)   Denmark DRM breaker reports himself to anti-piracy group (TorrentFreak)   Europe Pirate Party gets second seat in European Parliament (TorrentFreak) (IP Watch) File-sharers protected under proposed EU legislation –… [read post]