Search for: "Nation v. Nation" Results 5181 - 5200 of 56,596
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2019, 1:15 pm by Judge Paul Michel
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit was created to provide much-needed clarity and consistency to the nation's patent law. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 11:46 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Adler) Last night I reviewed the transcript of the oral argument in American Electric Power v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:03 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The event is part of a "national dialogue in the wake of Connick v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:32 pm by WIMS
Plaintiffs-Appellants Hells Canyon Preservation Council and The Wilderness Society (collectively, HCPC or plaintiffs) brought suit against the United States Forest Service (Forest Service or Service), seeking a judgment declaring: (1) that the Forest Service has failed to retain the original map of the Wilderness in violation of the Hells Canyon National Recreation Area Act, 16 U.S.C. § 460gg(b); (2) that the Forest Service’s description of the wilderness boundary is arbitrary and… [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 1:01 pm by GSU Law Student
Does the National Basketball Association (“NBA”) have the power to force the owner of Los Angeles Clippers (Donald Sterling) to sell his team after he made some racist remarks in a private conversation that was leaked to the public? [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 6:46 am
  First, state hostility could not have been as worrisome as respondents made it out to be given that the Court in National Bank v. [read post]
Although Congress later eliminated the national origin quota system and forbade race and nationality discrimination in the issuance of immigrant visas, the Supreme Court in Trump v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 2:08 pm
School discipline for derogatory blog v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 6:11 am by sally
Patmalniece v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (AIRE Centre intervening) [2011] UKSC 11; [2011] WLR (D) 91 “The conditions for entitlement to state pension credit, which included a requirement that a claimant had a right to reside in the United Kingdom or the Republic of Ireland, constituted indirect discrimination against nationals of other European Union member states which was, however, justified by the legitimate aim of protecting the resources of the United… [read post]