Search for: "New v. New"
Results 5181 - 5200
of 165,980
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2007, 9:42 am
"Good Legal News For Bloggers": The blog "Baseball Crank" this morning has a post that begins, "The Second Circuit ruled, in today's decision in Best Van Lines, Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:00 am
Matter of Bonifacio v Sewell 2024 NY Slip Op 02886 Decided on May 28, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:00 am
Matter of Bonifacio v Sewell 2024 NY Slip Op 02886 Decided on May 28, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
23 May 2016, 6:59 am
In so holding, New York’s highest court adopted the same standard of review announced by the Delaware Supreme Court in Kahn v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 2:48 am
As a pilot project, they are joining with the Zotero-Internet Archive New Orleans user group to develop a program in which individuals share primary source materials on New Orleans that they have collected. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 6:29 am
Houseman v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 9:31 am
The New Jersey Supreme Court explained in the 1992 case of Hennessey v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 6:00 am
In Cristler v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:05 am
Supreme Court handed down its decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 5:00 am
Trutanich v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:00 am
In Lu v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 11:14 am
Background on Garcetti and Public Employee Free Speech Some time ago I blogged critically about the Supreme Court‘s game-changing public employee free speech decision in Garcetti v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
In Munoz v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:10 pm
It is section 1983 black letter law after Monell v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 10:50 am
Introduction I blogged on February 16, 2011, about the Supreme Court‘s grant of certiorari in Camreta v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 5:00 am
In Vitug v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 8:46 am
You won't find it on BAILII, but today's decision of Mr Justice Kitchin in in Paul Allen (trustee of Adrian Jacobd, deceased) v Bloomsbury Publishing and JK Rowling [2010] EWHC 2560 (Ch) (Chancery Division, England and Wales) is brought to you here by the IPKat himself as an act of kindness. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 3:00 am
Sumption concluded that the test is as set out in R v Hughes: there must be “at least some act or omission in the control of the car which involves some element of fault, whether amounting to careless/inconsiderate driving or not, and which contributes in some more than minimal way to the death”. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 2:40 am
However, they rejected the appellant’s submission that this conclusion follows from the wording of POCA 2002, because of the principle enunciated in R v Waya [2012] UKSC 51 that property obtained as a result of or in connection with crime remains the defendant’s benefit whether or not he retains it. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 2:57 pm
The case is Pachter v. [read post]
