Search for: "PAGE v. UNITED STATES"
Results 5181 - 5200
of 9,966
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2014, 4:23 am
United States, a split decision by Justice Elena Kagan: Hell, yes! [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 5:45 am
Four years ago people advocating the abolition of software patents made a lot of noise, including a movie named Patent Absurdity, about a case pending then before the Supreme Court of the United States: Bilski v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:03 pm
Since then, the company has grown into a leader in the arts-and-crafts retail industry, with 588 stores and around 13,000 employees across the United States. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:19 am
It appears that Merck KGaA (MK) alleged that MSD had infringed its trade mark in the United Kingdom and, while it's not stated explicitly in the note received by this Kat, it looks as though there had been use of the mark but that MSD was arguing that it was a use that was permitted under the terms of the agreement, since MSD was arguing here that the agreement was governed by New Jersey law. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm
These awards cannot be enforced against the defendant in the United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 5:02 pm
By Merrill BentAnderson v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:38 pm
In sum, the term refers to the Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:38 pm
In sum, the term refers to the Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:18 am
Like he would be in the later Plessy v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:26 am
Three pages later, the brief again states that "small businesses with fewer than fifty employees—96% of all firms in the United States—are exempt from the ACA requirement that employers provide health insurance to their employees." [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 5:47 pm
City of New York, United States District Judge William Martini dismissed a complaint alleging that the New York... [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 8:16 am
Utility Air Regulatory Group (UTAG) v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 12:38 pm
United States, reversing and remanding Mr. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 7:57 am
Supreme Court itself recognized, "state courts are absolutely free to interpret state constitutional provisions to accord greater protection to individual rights than do similar provisions of the United States Constitution….The modification or reformulation of a privacy test is possible, thus, at the state level. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 12:12 pm
Marshall (2006) case (which I observed as a clerk) and the Stern v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 6:38 am
Unit B 1982). [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 7:31 pm
But at least in the United States, our rights are not so much stolen from us as they are simply lost by us. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 5:45 pm
Although the precise start date remains the subject of litigation—see United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am
Source (page 198) ____ Q: In FY2013, how many patents were issued to Cuba residents? [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 5:38 am
Indeed, the government argues that Congress should be assumed to have adopted the "rule" the Court announced in United States v. [read post]
