Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 5181 - 5200
of 6,183
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2010, 7:37 am
ahin v Turkey (2005) 44 EHRR 99, para 152). [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:52 am
In such circumstances, and against the backdrop of the law generally in this field being in a state of rapid flux at this time, the Court of Appeal in Greene might certainly be forgiven if, with the benefit of hindsight, it appears that it failed to apply Re S correctly. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 7:02 am
Case C-420/07, Apostolides v Orams [2009] ECR I-0000, para. 66). [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am
Meanwhile Longmore LJ stated that: The question in a case of misuse of private information is whether the information is private, not whether it is true or false. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
The source stated that the police officer “could be” the claimant and that he had reported this to the police. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 3:30 pm
Mack Trucks, Inc., 2010-1 Trade Cases ¶77,084.Further information about the jury verdict appears in a June 30, 2009 posting on Trade Regulation Talk. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 2:35 pm
Rcd. 11413, at ¶ 11. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 9:29 pm
As such, it is not a state agency for the purposes of state action immunity, the AAA argued.The brief is Shames v. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 8:16 pm
Daubert v. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 6:30 am
Bush v. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 12:40 pm
[¶] . . . [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 7:20 am
¶ 45.) [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 2:07 am
The men provided the court with a great deal of evidence in respect of supermax detention, including conditions of detention at ADX Florence, and its effects on prisoners (see paras 87 to 97 of the judgment). [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 10:46 pm
As Laws LJ said in Amare v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] EWCA Civ 1600, [2006] Imm AR 217 para 31: “The Convention is not there to safeguard or protect potentially affected persons from having to live in regimes where pluralist liberal values are less respected, even much less respected, than they are here. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 9:40 am
(at paras. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 4:50 am
State v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 2:16 am
Adedoyin v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 773; [2010] WLR (D) 172 “Dishonesty or deception was required to render a false representation a ground for mandatory refusal of an application for extension of leave to remain. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:30 am
HJ (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 31 (07 July 2010) - Read Judgment The Supreme Court has ruled that the government’s “Anne Frank” policy of sending back gay refugees to their home countries where they feared persecution is unlawful as it breached their human rights.. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
