Search for: "Peters v. Peters" Results 5181 - 5200 of 7,484
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
On 19 July 2024, the Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in Comptroller – General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks v Emotional Perception AI Limited [2024] EWCA Civ 825 following a hearing on 14-15 May 2024. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:14 am by Kate O’Sullivan (Bristows)
On 25 July 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Teva & Sandoz v Astellas[1] concerning the validity of Astellas’ patent to mirabegron for use in the treatment of overactive bladder (“OAB”). [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 6:59 am
Two New York blogging attorneys found themselves in a decision today out of our highest court, in Stern v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am by Wolfgang Demino
(Peter Thomas Lane, Schlanger & Schlanger LLP, Pleasantville, N.Y.; Owen Randolph Bragg, Horwitz, Horwitz & Associates, Chicago, IL, on the brief), for Saliha Madden.Thomas Arthur Leghorn (Joseph L. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 10:55 am
 Peter Ling reports on the Young ICCA - WIPO Seminar on IP Arbitration.Interested in Fashion law? [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
– America-Israel Patent Law) Accelerated examination (Inventive Step) Suggestions for USPTO Director David Kappos (IP Watchdog) Mystery graph of the day (Patently-O) The crisis in the American patent system (CanadaPatentBlog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC debates stays pending re-examination; Injunctions when claims are of ‘suspect validity’: Fresenius USA, Inc v Baxter International, Inc (Patently-O) (IP Law Observer) (Gray on Claims) CAFC:… [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 5:59 am
  Government Whistleblowers; Implications of Garcetti v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 6:19 am by Ruth Levush
(Case No. 24638-02-14 Shaarei Tsedek Medical Services Center v. [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 4:04 am by Becky (Hyun Jeong) Baek
Peter pointed out that lower court decisions in NY since 1545 Ocean Avenue in the 50/50 LLC dissolution context—including Advanced 23, LLC v Chamber House Partners, LLC and Goldstein v Pikus—continue to hold the line, rejecting deadlock as an independent ground for dissolution and considering it “only insofar as the deadlock impacted the LLC’s ability to function in the context of the operating agreement and its stated purpose. [read post]