Search for: "Robert v. State" Results 5181 - 5200 of 19,133
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2019, 9:12 am by Eric Goldman
by guest blogger Alexandra Jane Roberts When does using a competitor’s trademark as a hashtag create a false impression of association? [read post]
10 May 2019, 6:17 am
When Dual-Class Stock Met Corporate Spin-Offs Posted by Geeyoung Min (Columbia Law School) and Young Ran (Christine) Kim (University of Utah), on Friday, May 3, 2019 Tags: Agency costs, Agency model, Dividends, Dual-class stock, IPO Spinning, IPOs, Management, Mergers & acquisitions, Reorganizations, Shareholder voting, Spinoffs Aiming Toward the Future Posted by Tami Groswald-Ozery, Harvard Law School, on Friday, May 3, 2019 … [read post]
9 May 2019, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
” At Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog, Robert Gordon suggests that the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Lamps Plus Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 6:59 am by Adam Feldman
So far this term Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh have all been in the majority in all but one of the court’s 5-4 decisions (In Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
5 May 2019, 8:18 am by John Floyd
Bush in December 2001, handed down a decision, Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 8:56 am by Bryan Hawkins
The United States Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in the case of Mitchell v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 10:48 am
  Notably, Judge Newman dissented, stating that “failure to adhere closely to ba [read post]
1 May 2019, 9:00 am by David Bernstein
Last Thursday, federal district judge Robert Pitman released a lengthy opinion enjoining on First Amendment grounds a Texas law that requires state contractors to certify that they don't boycott Israel-related products. [read post]
1 May 2019, 5:00 am by Jason C. Gavejian and Maya Atrakchi
The Supreme Court, in a 5-4 ruling, authored by Chief Justice Roberts, held that the 9th Circuit panel erred in ruling that Lamps Plus, a lighting retailer, must participate in a class arbitration of an employee’s claims when the employment agreement did not state that class arbitration was available. [read post]