Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S." Results 5181 - 5200 of 6,067
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2013, 3:40 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The Court of Appeals held first that, whereas a purchase or sale of a security is necessary for entitlement to sue on the implied right of action recognized under § 10(b) and Rule 10b-5, the cause of action expressly provided by RICO imposes no such requirement limiting respondent’s standing. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:45 am
Lambert, No. 05-99011Denial of habeas relief from a conviction and death sentence for the first-degree murders of petitioner's wife and business partner is affirmed as: 1) a state court's holding that the trial court did not violate Faretta v. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 1:44 pm
So here's the story, the best we can piece it together from Fisher v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 5:59 am by Joy Waltemath
Though the dismissal of their FLSA claims was reversed, dismissal of their separate claims under Maryland wage law was affirmed (Schilling v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:47 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Glynn Lunney: He heard an argument for reduced damages for unauthorized users who create value, but that doesn’t implicate blocking copyrights as in Gracen v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 4:54 am
While the rest of the world has its eyes trained on the United States, desperately seeking first sight of In re Bilski, patent litigation is still taking place elsewhere, as is evidenced by last week's carefully-framed decision in KCI Licensing Inc and others v Smith and Nephew plc and others [2010] EWHC 1487 (Pat), a ruling of Mr Justice Arnold (Patents Court for England and Wales).Right: the IPKat is all in favour of dressings that don't press on his earsThis case, the… [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 2:14 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  In TM: Reynolds Wrap v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 5:15 am by Hutko
According to estimates, the sale of the book could have earned Houghton Mifflin $300.000-700.000 over the years. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 5:15 am by Hutko
According to estimates, the sale of the book could have earned Houghton Mifflin $300.000-700.000 over the years. [read post]