Search for: "State v. Character" Results 5181 - 5200 of 7,505
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2018, 4:43 am by Patricia Salkin
Here, the stated purpose of the Comprehensive Plan’s proposed designation of the undeveloped land as an agricultural protected zone had a rational relationship to numerous legitimate purposes, including, but not limited to, the preservation and promotion of agriculture, the preservation of “agricultural integrity”, and preservation of the Town’s rural aesthetics and character. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 9:32 am
The marks for which registration was sought included CHRONIC, MELLOW YELLOW and TARTUKAN DEATH WEED -- despite possible issues of genericity or lack of distinctive character. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 11:07 am by Jamie Markham
We know from many, many appellate cases that being a habitual felon is a status, not a crime, State v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 7:37 pm by Patricia Salkin
Thus the court held that Sherman stated a non-categorical takings claim and remanded it to be heard on the merits in District Court. [read post]
24 May 2018, 8:17 pm by Patricia Salkin
Heights of Lansing, LLC v Village of Lansing, 2018 WL 1747777 (NYAD 3 Dept. 4/12/2018)   [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:48 pm by Carter Ruml
  See KRS 427.170; MPM Financial Group v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 11:00 am by Gene Quinn
In the United States, that means litigation in federal district court, which can easily cost millions of dollars. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 4:38 am
The object of this case is a ruling of the Court of First Instance in Schräder v CPVO (Case T-187/06) mentioned on your website in November 2008 [here and here]. [read post]
19 May 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
A case such as Smith v Trafford Housing Trust is less clear cut. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 8:08 am
This drama has plenty to chew over: whether a chocolate twig is devoid of distinctive character; whether such shapes should be kept free for use by others; whether twig shapes are such as to give value to the product in question. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 11:07 am by Jamie Markham
We know from many, many appellate cases that being a habitual felon is a status, not a crime, State v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, December 17, 2008 US v. [read post]