Search for: "State v. Mark" Results 5181 - 5200 of 19,306
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2015, 4:04 am by Amy Howe
At Opinio Juris, William Dodge discusses Cardona v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 1:10 pm
| Good news and bad news for bio-pharmaceutical patenting in the United States | HP? [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 1:37 am by Amy Howe
At the Ogletree Deakins blog, Hera Arsen covers yesterday’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 3:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In opposition, Dineen failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Tantleff v Kestenbaum & Mark, 131 AD3d 955). [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 3:36 am by Russ Bensing
  Back in 1994, in State v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 7:28 am
| Skykick - why does it matter & what could it mean for trade marks? [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 4:01 am by Alessandro Cerri
 The requirements for conversion of an EUTM are set out in Article 139(2)(b) of the EU Trade Mark Regulation (EUTMR), which prohibits conversion in Member States where: "in accordance with the decision of the Office or of the national court, grounds for refusal of registration or grounds for revocation or invalidity apply to the EU trade mark application or EU trade mark. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” At Quartz, Ephrat Livni discusses Dassey v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 9:00 am by admin
by Mark Wiletsky Mark Wiletsky As COVID-19 vaccinations increase and states ease pandemic-related restrictions, many employers are beginning to plan for employees’ to return to the office. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” At Slate, Mark Joseph Stern remarks that the court’s decision last week in Carpenter v. [read post]