Search for: "State v. S. R. R."
Results 5181 - 5200
of 71,793
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
Knick v. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 12:28 pm
Today, the New Jersey Supreme Court issued a decision in Mount Laurel Township v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
Susan V. [read post]
10 May 2019, 9:51 am
(quoting Ahmed v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 6:41 pm
After the action was filed, F&R recorded its Security Agreement against WYD’s thirteen trademarks with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”).F&R eventually was granted summary judgment in its state court breach of contract action and the court awarded F&R $348,651.18 [ed. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 8:22 am
In Marks v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:38 am
“Nevertheless, plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on the account stated claim cannot be granted as to the other amounts billed, because plaintiff has not demonstrated entitlement to dismissal of defendant’s legal malpractice counterclaims, which are sufficiently intertwined with the account stated claim so as to provide a bona fide defense (see Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady, LLP v Rose, 111 AD3d 453, 454 [1st Dept… [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 10:36 am
Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
Canadian Broadcasting Corp., [1994] 3 S.C.R. 835 (S.C.C.) and restated in R. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 4:04 am
R. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 12:26 am
Scrutinizer GmbH, September 13, 2018, Lynch, S.). [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 10:40 pm
Because a prior art patent did not meet the disputed claim limitation under the proper construction, the Board’s conclusion that six challenged claims were unpatentable as anticipated was reversed (Home Semiconductor Corp. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 11:45 pm
The Board’s findings as to the DuPont factors were supported by substantial evidence, in the court’s view. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 8:13 pm
Although the Board erred in its analysis by declining to apply a prosecution disclaimer limiting the patent’s claims such that they excluded those of a prior art patent, the court affirmed the Board’s determination based on its alternative holding that, even if the prosecution history disclaimer were accepted, the claims at issue still were unpatentable for obviousness (Arendi S.A.R.L. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
This appeal is concerned with the fourth category of authority and it is therefore necessary to consider the Supreme Court’s recent decision in R (Gourlay) v Parole Board [2020] UKSC 50. [read post]
6 May 2011, 12:50 pm
(“SBAR”) v. [read post]
Cohen v Cohen, 2016 WL 4546980 (E.D. Missouri, 2016) [israel] [Habitual Residence] [Petition denied]
16 Sep 2016, 9:31 am
” Stern v. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 7:36 am
Davis -- state power to tax residents' interest income on other states' bonds, if home-state bond interest is exempt Tue., Nov. 6 John R. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 11:39 am
Following a hearing, the federal court granted the injured man’s motion and sent the case back to state court. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 3:05 pm
Osman, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Harrow (2017) EWHC 274 (Admin) A challenge to Harrow’s allocation policy, specifically on the ‘downgrading’ of allocation priority for overcrowded households in PRS accommodation, while existing Harrow tenants kept the higher priority for overcrowding on a transfer application. [read post]
