Search for: "State v. Sotomayor"
Results 5181 - 5200
of 5,862
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2010, 8:58 am
Citing Buckley v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 8:01 am
United States No. 08-876, Black v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 7:33 am
Justices Breyer, Stevens, and Sotomayor don't like the part of Justice Thomas's opinion that they think tends to undermine Panetti v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:40 pm
As Anna Christensen noted in her earlier post, the Court’s opinion in Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 5:56 am
As Jay noted here, Holder v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
Before you issue such a First Amendment-shredding opinion as Holder, et al. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 6:28 pm
The legal, business, and scientific communities eagerly await the Supreme Court’s ruling in Bilski v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:53 pm
Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:16 am
Joining his opinion were Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor (right). [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:31 am
Holder (Attorney General) v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 5:57 am
Yesterday in Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 10:22 pm
The case most discussed by Sotomayor's interlocutors was Ricci v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:24 am
In Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:49 am
The cases of Holder v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:00 am
UPDATED: June 21, 2010 at 11:55 am Straight from the Broken Record department, the United States Supreme Court has again not issued a decision in Bilski v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 7:38 am
In Holder v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 6:22 am
United States (No. 09-6338), the Court rejected the petitioner’s contention that its decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 7:15 pm
On Thursday, the Supreme Court held in Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 1:58 pm
Supreme Court considered a "takings" case from the State of Florida -- Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 1:10 pm
United States; City of Ontario v. [read post]