Search for: "Still v. Justice Court"
Results 5181 - 5200
of 19,599
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2023, 2:36 pm
The Supreme Court’s 1982 decision in Havens Realty Corp. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:12 am
In the Stanford Lawyer, Jim Sonne discusses the Court’s recent decision in EEOC v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
By the 1980s, the Supreme Court has decided Roe v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:09 am
On Thursday, the Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Court of Justice of Germany) announced (in German) its decision to make a request for preliminary ruling--briefly called preliminary reference--to the European Court of Justice (ECJ). [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 10:40 am
The The Supreme Court Decision in KURNS, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF CORSON, DECEASED, ET AL. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 4:04 am
*In the retroactivity opinion of Montgomery v. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 11:42 pm
But in its August 3rd decision, the Supreme Court justices found Measure Z just as constitutionally deficient as had both lower courts. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 4:42 pm
Although the Supreme Court last year in Moore v. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 5:07 pm
v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 3:18 pm
The answer, it turns out, is that we still do not know. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 1:46 pm
This week’s decision from the British Columbia Court of Appeal in Ghavim v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
On Thursday a unanimous Mississippi Supreme Court partially affirmed the trial court's grant of summary judgment on Daubert issues in Patterson v. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 8:55 am
U.S., on double jeopardy) and has yet to decide whether to overturn two notable administrative-law precedents in the still-pending case of Kisor v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:51 pm
The first case to come to many minds probably is the landmark 1973 ruling of Roe v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 8:47 am
See Rasul v. [read post]
Symposium: Supreme Court disavows precedent, refusing to protect women from abortion industry abuses
27 Jun 2016, 11:08 am
In January 1973, in Roe v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 12:38 am
A case tenants need to read.High court rules on landlord-tenant disputeLandlords must refund a security deposit and can't get money back for property damage if they don't adequately or timely notify tenants about those claims, but landlords can still recover unpaid rent and other losses, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled today.In a landlord-tenant dispute involving Indiana's statutes on back-rent payment and return of a security deposit, justices… [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 8:02 pm
In 2009, writing for a seven justice majority of the Supreme Court, Justice Scalia explained: If a litigant believes that an error has occurred (to his detriment) during a federal judicial proceeding, he must object in order to preserve the issue. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 11:39 am
Apple consumer class action (that went all the way up to the Supreme Court) as well as Epic Games v. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:57 am
The case is entitled East Bay Drywall v. [read post]
