Search for: "Unit, Inc., Appeal of" Results 5181 - 5200 of 13,891
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2016, 6:03 pm by H. Scott Leviant
Aug. 22, 2016) that an arbitration agreement that precludes collective actions violates rights protected by the NLRA, you may wish to know where things stand with that case on further appeal. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:25 pm by Devin C. Reid and Alexander J. Baynham
Nov. 17, 2016), a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently limited the effect of the collateral source rule in a maritime employee’s personal injury action against a non-employer. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:25 pm by Devin C. Reid and Alexander J. Baynham
Nov. 17, 2016), a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently limited the effect of the collateral source rule in a maritime employee’s personal injury action against a non-employer. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:25 pm by Devin C. Reid and Alexander J. Baynham
Nov. 17, 2016), a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently limited the effect of the collateral source rule in a maritime employee’s personal injury action against a non-employer. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 9:12 am by Quinta Jurecic
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces and current Chair of the American Bar Association Standing Committee on Law and National Security. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether the residual clause of the sentencing guidelines is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
24 Nov 2016, 8:23 pm by Kate Howard
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has held. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 4:24 pm by Ashlee Grant
  It is expected that the appeals will ensue to the United States Supreme Court regardless of Judge Mazzant’s final decision and the final decision of the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 1:57 pm by Percival C. Olsen and Bradley Graveline
Steuben Foods, Inc., IPR2014-00041, Paper 117 (PTAB 2014), cited in Rule Recognizing Privileged Communications Between Clients and Patent Practitioners at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, 81 Fed. [read post]