Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 5181 - 5200
of 10,422
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2012, 7:05 am
It was the subject of Edwards v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
Merely stating the seemingly obvious--that the unit of analysis is “the case”--does not solve all problems. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 12:26 am
There’s been a marked shift. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:56 pm
Pix Credit Audience Chamber Piazza della Signoria Apartments of the Priors c. 1543 In the United States at least, there has been an increasing worry about the state of U.S. relations (economic and political) with Latin American states. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am
Knight (EPLAW) (IPKat) INTA special reports: Sir Robin Jacob’s speech; a century of trade mark law; damages in Europe (IPKat) (IPKat) (IPKat) United States US Patent Reform What Congress should do to fix the patent system, step 1 (Patenthink) Patent Reform Update: Summer debate ahead for America Invents Act (Patent Law Practice Center) How Article One relates to patent quality and reform (Patent Quality Matters) US Patents USPTO expands first action interview pilot… [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:59 pm
See State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 9:02 am
In Virtual Works, Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 1:53 pm
” Over time, these restrictions were removed – a trend most dramatically marked by the 1967 United States Supreme Court ruling in Loving v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 1:53 pm
” Over time, these restrictions were removed – a trend most dramatically marked by the 1967 United States Supreme Court ruling in Loving v. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 1:34 am
China The State Council of China published the Regulations on Administration of Network Data Security, which will take effect on 1 January 2025. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 7:47 am
State v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 7:36 am
This guide has been compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a portion of their One-Stop Resource Guide. [read post]
4 May 2022, 4:00 am
It then also notes that the plaintiffs and the United States as amicus had connected the abortion right to the right of consenting adults to engage in same-sex sexual conduct (recognized in Lawrence v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:44 am
R (on the application of Toraane and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 23. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 9:27 pm
”) Normally does not mean always.[1] See Normally, Cambridge Dictionary (2019), https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dict ionary/english/normally (defining “normally” as “usually or regularly” and “usually, or in most cases” (emphasis added)); see also United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am
The European Court of Human Rights in the decision Bayev and others v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 1:30 pm
Earle, 405 F.3d 278, 286 (5th Cir. 2005) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 1:07 am
United States Subscription Required
U.S. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
In Groff v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 1:53 pm
The Northern District of Illinois recently debated this in Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. [read post]
