Search for: "United States v. Minor"
Results 5181 - 5200
of 7,102
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2011, 9:33 am
The details appear below: * United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 7:59 am
On the same day, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Christian Peters obtained a warrant to arrest Todd for `[s]ending, bringing into the state depictions of minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct and [p]ossession of depictions of [m]inor engaged in sexually explicit conduct. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 4:31 am
" This, in turn, "creat[ed] a loophole in the law for men who go abroad to have sex with minors, which in the United States is considered statutory rape. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 3:59 pm
In United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 3:02 pm
Smith (R-TX) on March 30, 2011, the first significant change to the United States patent system has arrived. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 6:23 am
Or is it a case about the extent of the state’s power to protect minors? [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:40 am
In Katz v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 2:54 am
G. v the United Kingdom – 37334/08 [2011] ECHR 1308 (30 August 2011) ??? [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 10:48 pm
John Cornyn, then Texas Attorney-General (now United States Senator), said that it was wrong. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 7:10 am
Norinder was from Sweden and Fuentes was from the United States. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 9:23 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The decision is Sarhan v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 5:21 am
His calls to Craig Williams, the forensic scientist, and Lynn Jordheim, First Assistant United States Attorney for the District of North Dakota, further establish prudence and good faith. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
Ruthann Robson The controversial decision of the United States Supreme Court last year in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 3:07 pm
S. 584, 602 (1979) (“Our jurisprudence historically has reflected Western civilization concepts of the family as a unit with broad parental authority over minor children. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 2:11 pm
See United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 9:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 11:01 am
On the other hand, “a disclaimer should not remove more than is necessary […] to restore novelty […]” (see G 1/03 [headnote 2.2] and [3]).[5.5.1] The second paragraph of G 1/03 [3] states“However, the only justification for the disclaimer is to exclude a novelty-destroying disclosure […]. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 8:22 am
Stoner was born in the United States. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 8:19 am
On May 12, 2011, Petitioner filed with the Office of Children's Issues, United States Department of State, an application for the return of the Children. [read post]
