Search for: "Voter v. Voter"
Results 5181 - 5200
of 6,839
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2011, 8:26 pm
Erickson and Washington v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 9:28 am
[Wajert; Fisher @ Forbes; Patch v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:23 am
Writing in the Guardian, Richard Moorhead concludes that “legal aid cuts do not lose votes” and that, in turn, the legal profession’s objections to the cuts need to start to chime with voters. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 12:37 pm
[V]oters show they are fairly cynical about Democratic politicians’ stands. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 11:53 am
Shelby County, Alabama v Holder (2010) is challenging the constitutionality of section 5. [read post]
Court Tentatively Decides That State Law Preempts Proposed San Francisco Ban on Circumcision of Boys
28 Jul 2011, 9:15 am
City of San Diego v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:05 am
Relying on the holding of Town of Tiburon v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 12:00 pm
In particular, it distinguished Williams v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 11:14 am
“The voters need to know what their public officials are doing. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 9:29 pm
Rick Hills compares the Arizona case to Regan v. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 11:34 am
S. 463 (1993), relevant mitigating evidence to be disregarded, see, e. g., Johnson v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:48 pm
Ruth V. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 8:40 am
Marion County (upholding Indiana’s voter identification law) and its recent decision in Arizona Free Enterprise Club v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 1:28 am
Mitchell and Katzenbach v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
The contributions to this on-line symposium on S.B. 1070 and Arizona v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
In Rubin v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 8:14 pm
This change of heart emerged shortly after the Supreme Court’s ruling in First National Bank of Boston v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 4:51 pm
The state’s response in Busefink v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 3:16 pm
New York marks the fifth state in a row in which marriage equality has been achieved legislatively rather than through state court intervention: soon after Varnum v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
One of the two was an election case that concerned the legality (and constituionality) of California allowing political parties to insert mailers in the sample voter ballots at no marginal cost. [read post]
