Search for: "v. JONES" Results 5181 - 5200 of 9,905
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2012, 7:57 am by Brian Shiffrin
It is well settled that a post-trial motion pursuant to CPL 330.30 cannot preserve a contention for review that is raised for the first time in the motion (see People v McFadden, 94 AD3d 1150, 1150; People v Jones, 85 AD3d 1667, 1668), but as noted that is not what occurred here inasmuch as defendant made an objection before jury selection. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 10:12 am by Kent Scheidegger
Supreme Court precedent is flatly contrary, see Jones v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 10:08 am by Kali Borkoski
On Monday, SCOTUSblog will kick off an online symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:12 am by Rachel Sachs
An article in the Washington Times focuses on Antoine Jones, the respondent in this Term’s United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 3:25 pm by Harry Styron
” The content of the redemption notices need not be elaborate Sneil, LLC v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 7:01 am by Howard Wasserman
Did Chief Justice Roberts or Justice Scalia vote as they did in United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 3:48 am by Russ Bensing
Jones (9-0):  Defendant’s conviction was vacated because a GPS device was attached to his car and used to monitor his movements. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:50 am by sally
“The purpose of this article is to consider the law of constructive trusts following Jones v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am by Blog  Editorial
  In relation to control, no material difference as regards the position of the state. 15.07: Thomas de la Mare QC takes the Court through the cases of Barnado and Mallin v Clark. [read post]