Search for: "ACCESS TO JUSTICE COMMISSION"
Results 5201 - 5220
of 8,037
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm
This edition of “Petitions to Watch” features cases up for consideration at the Justices’ last scheduled private conference of the Term, on Thursday, June 24. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 3:10 pm
"But where are the unitary executive proponents -- in the Administration and among the academic and other champions of Justice Scalia's dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 1:20 pm
The judge agreed in principle, subject to access to the two installations and space availability. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Senate Bill 544 seeks to remove requirements to post all teleconference locations, post agendas at each location, and make those locations accessible to the public. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Justice Dept. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 6:51 pm
Human Rights Commission's Management Plan for the next several years. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 4:10 pm
Stamer and her experience or to access other publications by Ms. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 5:07 am
.In many merger cases, the contribution of antitrust law begins and ends in the United States Department of Justice. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:41 am
(b) Corroboration is not sufficient for the purposes of this article if the corroboration only shows the commission of the offense. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 7:54 am
Finally, the OCSSP must act expeditiously to disable access to or to remove content upon receiving a corresponding request from the rights holder. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 7:54 am
Finally, the OCSSP must act expeditiously to disable access to or to remove content upon receiving a corresponding request from the rights holder. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 7:54 am
Finally, the OCSSP must act expeditiously to disable access to or to remove content upon receiving a corresponding request from the rights holder. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:03 pm
The judgment can be accessed here. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
” Previously, the habits and norms typical of an appellate tribunal had fostered a “norm of acquiesence” that pressed the justices to suppress dissent and rally behind unanimous opinions, but the luxurious discretion available to the justices after 1925 gradually undermined those institutional standards. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 2:15 pm
These are known as “John Stings” or “Reverse Stings,” and technically referred to by the Department of Justice as “demand reduction interventions. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 6:38 am
FEDERAL CANNABIS ACT Purpose The purpose of the Cannabis Act is to protect public health and safety by: (i) protecting the health of young persons by restricting their access to cannabis; (ii) protecting young persons and others from inducements to use cannabis; (iii) providing for the licit production of cannabis to reduce illicit activities in relation to cannabis; (iv) deterring illicit activities in relation to cannabis through appropriate sanctions and enforcement measures; (v)… [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:34 am
’ Texas Department of Criminal Justice v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:57 pm
The paper (in English) may be accessed HERE. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 2:44 pm
Eagle-eyed readers may have spotted that this weblog has yet to report on a 21 May 2015 IP decision from the Court of Justice of the European Union, (CJEU), this being Case C‑546/12 P Ralf Schräder v Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO). [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 11:25 am
In October of 2015, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) sent shockwaves through the tech industry when, in the Schrems case, it struck down the Agreement. [read post]
