Search for: "BROWN v. BROWN" Results 5201 - 5220 of 14,310
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2020, 11:30 am by luiza
 An image from the government’s complaint shows the difference (U.S. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 10:54 am by Samuel Cohen
First, the recent group litigation case of Various Claimants v Morrison Supermarkets PLC (case citation number: [2018] EWCA Civ 2339), which centred upon a rogue employee’s misuse of personal data, included evidence and judicial comment on the nature and adequacy of Morrison’s data security policies and procedures. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:01 am by Liz Dunshee
” – to hear the team of Quinn Emanuel lawyers who litigated & won the landmark AB Stable v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 3:05 am by Florence Campbell Jones
The Supreme Court decision in Gilham v Ministry of Justice3 held that PIDA protections can apply to holders of public office even without any formal contracts of employment. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 12:54 pm by Samuel Cohen
The post General Court: disclosure of earlier design cannot be proved by means of probabilities or suppositions appeared first on Brown Rudnick. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 10:25 pm
In Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Macdonald (No 12) [2009] NSWSC 714 Justice Gzell of the New South Wales Supreme Court refused to exonerate the former James Hardie directors and executives who contravened section 180(1) Corporations Act in Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Macdonald (No 11)[2009] NSWSC 287 relating to their approving the content of the Draft ASX Announcement at the February 2001 board meeting and related matters. [read post]