Search for: "C/T"
Results 5201 - 5220
of 50,085
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2014, 6:34 pm
[C]ounsel for Google represtented that David Rose paid $15,000 for his share of the AirMedia assets . . .[; C]ounsel for SimpleAir stated that . . . [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 2:58 am
There are notoriously known marks (6bis Paris Convention) but these fall under 8(2)(c) CTMR, not under 8(4). [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 9:12 am
The General Court’s decision The General Court dismissed the appeal (case T-470/23). [read post]
20 May 2018, 10:20 am
¿Cómo controlará el gobierno este comportamiento?. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 4:13 am
The judge ruled that TufAmerica, didn’t have the exclusive rights to the two samples in question. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 8:15 am
There’s no right of attribution in the Copyright Act, but that didn’t matter. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 3:56 am
Consequently, the term 'greenworld' had an unambiguous significance: it indicated that the marked products helped to conserve the environment.The Court rejected the applicant's arguments that (i) the ambiguous adjective 'green' could also convey a non-descriptive meaning (see also Case C-191/01 P, DOUBLEMINT, para 32.) and (ii) Wikipedia did not contain information on any descriptive meaning of the term 'greenworld' (see also Case T-325/11,… [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 7:56 am
Code § 1030(a)(2)(C) and [§1030](c)(2)(B)(ii). [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 1:58 pm
c? [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 1:58 pm
c? [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 5:56 am
A) "Ain't Too Proud to Beg" B) "Treat Her Like a Lady" C) "My Girl" D) "The Girl's Alright With Me" 4. [read post]
Terrible Ninth Circuit 230(c)(2) Ruling Will Make the Internet More Dangerous–Enigma v. Malwarebytes
19 Sep 2019, 11:06 am
If so, we don’t need Section 230(c)(2)(B) to police this corner of the marketplace. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 6:11 am
” Thus, “a copyright holder must consider the existence of fair use before sending a takedown notification under § 512(c). [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm
This principle was laid down in decision T 208/84 [16], re-affirmed in decision T 154/04 [8(G)] and recently confirmed in opinion G 3/08 [10.7.1, 10.13.2 (citing T 154/04), and 12.2.2]). [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 8:04 am
This isn’t the first time a court has grazed the iTunes/512(c) issue without Apple’s involvement (see the Rock River case), and it would be less than ideal for Apple if courts keep concluding that iTunes doesn’t qualify for 512(c) before Apple has a chance to make its own case. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 3:43 am
C (“can’t teach an old dog new tricks”) probably needs no explanation. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 4:31 am
The Ordinance, in turn, states that "[t]he City hereby adopts and incorporates herein its stated findings and legislative record related to the adverse secondary effects of sexually oriented businesses, including the judicial opinions and reports related to such secondary effects. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 7:57 pm
I haven't taught the case in nearly a decade, but the zinger is still fresh in my mind. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 7:40 am
But S&C wasn't prepared for Mark Weber. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 10:24 am
The professor liked Student A, and didn’t particularly like Students B or C. [read post]
