Search for: "California v. Force" Results 5201 - 5220 of 6,451
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2010, 12:08 pm by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 7,458,187 owned by EI-Land Corporation and entitled FORCE-RESISTING DEVICES AND METHODS FOR STRUCTURES. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:13 am by Sheppard Mullin
 While this proposition has seldom been addressed, the 1997 ruling in English v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:13 am by Sheppard Mullin
 While this proposition has seldom been addressed, the 1997 ruling in English v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court N D California: ‘Greed’ and overreaching forfeit sanctions award: Goodman Ball, Inc., et. al. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 2:01 pm by The Complex Litigator
Indeed, in characterizing violations of California meal period obligations in Murphy, the California Supreme Court repeatedly described it as an obligation not to force employees to work through breaks. [read post]
  In short, had this employer followed more scrupulously the admonitions of the California Supreme Court (see, Armendariz v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:53 pm by Mike
Supreme Court found that the California parole statute was not an Ex Post Facto law in California Dept. of Corrections v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 2:38 pm by Conor McEvily
Today’s first petition of the day is: Title: Werner v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 1:32 am by Mike
California, (U.S. 2003) (upholding sentence of 25 years to life under three strikes law for stealing three golf clubs); Lockyer v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 7:02 am
However, keeping in line with the theme of surprise this week, Olson also joined forces with his opposing counsel in Bush v Gore, David Boies, to bring and win a federal suit to overturn Prop 8 banning gay marriage in California in Perry v Schwarzenegger.A few weeks ago, Google submitted a motion to the 2nd Circuit court to consolidate the appeals of Viacom and the class action suit headed by the Premier League. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:18 am by GuestPost
This ruling represented arguably the most important family law case decided by the Supreme Court and the most significant judgment dealing with ancillary relief matters since Miller v Miller, McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24. [read post]