Search for: "Companies A, B, and C" Results 5201 - 5220 of 12,893
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
§ 1369(b)(1) gives courts of appeals (and not district courts) exclusive original jurisdiction over challenges to the Clean Water Rule. [read post]
§ 1369(b)(1) gives courts of appeals (and not district courts) exclusive original jurisdiction over challenges to the Clean Water Rule. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 9:07 am by MBettman
Ohio Constitution, Article IV, Section 2(B)(2)(c) (The Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction in […] cases in which the death penalty has been imposed.) [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 4:04 am
(c) Although the hearing officer was only given the evidence on the day of the hearing she had the opportunity to consider it in her reserved judgment. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 5:43 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
The proposal generally implores states to do three things: (a) ban non-competes for low-wage workers, those who do not have access to trade secrets, and those are who are laid off; (b) require upfront disclosure about non-competes and additional tangible consideration (beyond mere employment itself) for employees who sign them; and (c) adopt a strict red-pencil doctrine that would eliminate a court's discretion to rewrite overbroad agreements. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 10:39 am by Ron Coleman
The Board therefore found the marks to be famous under Section 43(c)(2)(A). [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 9:10 am by Brian Cordery
More from our authors: Patent Protection for Second Medical Uses by Jochen Bühling (ed.) [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 4:10 pm by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
For example, the regulations provide this example: (i) In year 1, W, a foreign corporation, forms and contributes assets to X, a domestic limited liability company that does not elect to be treated as a corporation under §301.7701-3(c) of this chapter. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 10:23 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
”  The complaint alleges that the company’s contracts described the APR as “[c]ost of your credit interest (only) per year. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 10:51 am by Mark Tushnet
(b) If it is, and if similar state statutes are enacted, they will be given extremely narrow interpretations. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 6:04 am
  More specifically, can a letter sent in English from a Germany company to a US parent company regarding infringement of an EU trade mark constitute a threat to bring trade mark infringement proceedings in England and Wales? [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (A) (a Child) (by her litigation friend B) v Secretary of State for Health, heard 2 November 2016. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Justices Côté and Brown would dissent and dismiss the appeal, substantially for the reasons of the majority in the Court of Appeal. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:43 pm by Chuck Cosson
  The “dust cloud” metaphor is apt as a “dust cloud” a) obscures; b) interferes with intended functionality; c) appears to come from no single origin; d) can be harmful to life and property. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 1:00 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
Here are the tell-tale signs: (a) active resistance to disclosing the information allegedly stolen; (b) broad, unintelligible descriptions of the trade secrets at issue; (c) hedging and qualifying as to what the information at issue actually is; and (d) outright speculation as to how anything was stolen. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 10:03 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
– ¿Cómo se computa el tiempo de trabajo de los choferes Uber a los fines del pago de las horas extras II. [read post]