Search for: "Doe VI " Results 5201 - 5220 of 5,626
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
It is also a fundamental tenet that copyright does not protect all copying from a work. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
A&M RECORDS, INC., a corporation; GEFFEN RECORDS, INC., a corporation; INTERSCOPE RECORDS; SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, INC.; MCA RECORDS, INC.; ATLANTIC RECORDING CORP.; ISLAND RECORDS, INC.; MOTOWN RECORD CO.; CAPITOL RECORDS, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.NAPSTER, INC., Defendant-Appellant.JERRY LEIBER, individually and doing business as, JERRY LEIBER MUSIC; MIKE STOLLER and FRANK MUSIC CORP., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.NAPSTER, INC.,… [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm by Robichaud
DISINCENTIVES TOWARDS INNOCENCE: A LOOK AT WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS IN THE ONTARIO CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM (Sean Robichaud, 2004)*  * This is an older paper written many years ago. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm by Robichaud
DISINCENTIVES TOWARDS INNOCENCE: A LOOK AT WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS IN THE ONTARIO CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM (Sean Robichaud, 2004)*  * This is an older paper written many years ago. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:48 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
The Third Arbitration Trilogy: Stolt-Nielsen, Rent-A-Center, Concepcion and the Future of American Arbitration American Review of International Arbitration, 2012Thomas Stipanowich Pepperdine University School of Law Abstract: For the third time in the modern era, a triad of key Supreme Court decisions represents a milestone in American arbitration. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 6:54 am by Jason A. Weis, Esq.
What it does: Provides that that no one can be compelled to give evidence against him or herself in a criminal prosecution. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:39 am by admin
What it does: Provides that that no one can be compelled to give evidence against him or herself in a criminal prosecution. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 11:44 am by Eric Goldman
  First, does section 411(a) require only a completed application, or does it require that the application has been approved (or rejected)? [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 2:41 pm by Ben Sperry
Moreover, the closest analogy for Section 60506’s “based on” language is the “on the ground of” language of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which also does not include the “otherwise” language found to be so important in Inclusive Communities. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 4:36 am by rnahoum
The term does not include – (A) any officer or employee of a creditor while, in the name of the creditor, collecting debts for such creditor; (B) any person while acting as a debt collector for another person, both of whom are related by common ownership or affiliated by corporate control, if the person acting as a debt collector does so only for persons to whom it is so related or affiliated and if the principal business of such person is not the collection of debts; (C) any… [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 8:19 am by Steven Hansen
Such reliance does not affect petitioners' obligation to demonstrate that they meet all requirements of this paragraph as required by subparagraph (C)(i).';(2) in paragraph (2)(A), by striking `include to,' and inserting `include'; and(3) by redesignating paragraph (5) as paragraph (8) and inserting after paragraph (4) the following:`(5) EXCEPTION FOR OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLES-`(A) IN GENERAL- Subsection (a) shall not apply to an off-highway vehicle. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 9:43 am by Ashley Morgan
How does your health care practice or organization define sexual harassment or sexual misconduct? [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
(Esther Kiobel, one of the Ogoni 9 Pix Credit HERE)On 1 May 2019, the Court of the Hague (first instance) delivered its (very long) opinion in Case number C / 09/540872 / HA ZA 17-1048 brought by four widows of the Ogoni 9 against the Shell companies, including ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC in London, United Kingdom, with offices in The Hague, and SHELL PETROLEUM N.V. in The Hague. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 9:02 am
Penalty means a late charge imposed by the payee for paying after the disbursement is due.It does not include any additional charge or fee imposed by the payee associated with choosing installment payments as opposed to annual payments or for choosing one installment plan over another. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Williams, the court pointed out that “a person can make a promise to himself, but the law does not provide remedies for breach of such promises. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 10:02 am by John Elwood
The government agrees that the Sixth Circuit erred, but opposes cert. because it does not believe the case is important enough. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 1:56 pm by Giles Peaker
The Defendant argues that as long as the interest is paid, what real impact does it have on the Claimant? [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 4:50 pm
While the HITECH Act does not expressly mandate that those technical safeguards will be the only effective technical means of satisfying HIPAA security safeguards, those covered entities and business associates who choose not to comply with the HHS guidance provisions will have to justify any alternative choices of technical systems they might make in the event of a subsequent mishap. [read post]
8 May 2022, 2:35 pm by Russell Knight
“Harassment” means knowing conduct which is not necessary to accomplish a purpose that is reasonable under the circumstances; would cause a reasonable person emotional distress; and does cause emotional distress to the petitioner. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 5:52 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
While civil litigation replicates the adversarial examination of evidence in the pretrial stage that formerly occurred at trial, criminal litigation often does not, resulting in settlements that are induced by the excessive risks attached to declining them and that rest on evidence that escapes evaluation by both courts and the defense. [read post]