Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 5201 - 5220
of 9,560
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2014, 12:23 pm
Norlander, 2012 BCSC 719 (Master)… [34] Read together, the above authorities stand for these propositions: 1. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 9:40 am
Id. at *1 (text added). [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 7:00 am
Thus, in 2010, only 35% of the sample claimed that they knew something about the drone program, whereas 43% stated they knew nothing about it. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:44 pm
The Rutherfords’ claim was article 14 disability discrimination by way of Art 1 Prot 1 rights. [read post]
29 May 2014, 8:03 pm
Holdings[1][a] “Although the written description does define the ‘data compression type descriptor’ as ‘any recognizable data token or descriptor that indicates which data encoding technique has been applied to the data,’ the preceding sentence [in the Specification] also teaches that "an appropriate data compression type descriptor is appended to the encoded data block. [read post]
29 May 2014, 8:09 am
35 U.S.C. [read post]
29 May 2014, 4:00 am
This book does not. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:49 pm
John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 18 (1966). [read post]
26 May 2014, 12:00 pm
The claim here does not do so. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:15 am
As to the character of the Clippers, there does not appear to be a true 'form of title' applicable, per Marriage of Brooks & Robinson (2008) 169 CA4th 176, 86 CR3d 624. [read post]
20 May 2014, 10:02 pm
I did get a late start on August 1, 2013. [read post]
20 May 2014, 4:31 pm
Therefore, we will enter a new ground of rejection of claims 1-50, 53, and 54 as indefinite under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
19 May 2014, 9:00 am
And here’s the AdvoKat General’s Opinion.1. [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:16 pm
The patent application for this method, more specifically described under Claim 1 and Claim 4 (both under contention), the latter of which puts the former in a mathematical equation, were initially rejected by the patent examiner. [read post]
15 May 2014, 7:53 am
§ 1337(a)(1)(B)(i) does not extend to articles that infringe under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
14 May 2014, 9:56 am
Just because a driver has fled does not mean recovery is impossible. [read post]
14 May 2014, 9:56 am
Just because a driver has fled does not mean recovery is impossible. [read post]
13 May 2014, 10:05 pm
That means that you can get a Transporter Sync for only $79, spend another $70 on Amazon for a 1 TB drive, and you are all set. [read post]
13 May 2014, 7:55 pm
Packard’s applied-for patent claims indefinite, and therefore not in compliance with the statutory drafting requirements of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
13 May 2014, 3:11 pm
Clay, a trial court abuses its discretion if its judgment is “manifestly unreasonable,” does not apply the law, or is based on “partiality, prejudice, bias or ill-will. [read post]
